Ginkgo Biloba (Ginkgo biloba) trees in India

·       One of the oldest herbs in use today, ginkgo has a broad range of indications. For asthma sufferers, ginkgo works to inhibit PAF (platelet activating factor), a powerful inducer of platelet aggregator and anaphylactic reactions. Natural Herbs that stimulate anti-PAF activity are known to assist in the treatment of asthma, allergic reactions, thrombosis and shock. One study showed that a 600mg standardised dose of ginkgo reduced airway hypersensitivity in patients with asthma.  

     Availability : Tea leaves,plant & seeds  (WhatsApp : 9858986794)

   

a

A

China defends contentious CPEC, says it is economic initiative and has not affected its stand on Kashmir issue

India has protested to China over the CPEC, the flagship project of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as it traverses through Pakistan-administrated Jammu and Kashmir .

Beijing, May 24 (PTI) China on Monday again defended its controversial USD 60 billion CPEC project with Pakistan, disregarding India''s protests as it is being laid through Pakistan administrated Kashmir, saying it is an economic initiative and has not affected its principled stand on the Kashmir issue.

Leaders of China and Pakistan have praised the progress of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in recent days as the two close allies celebrated the establishment of 70 years of their diplomatic relations. 

India has protested to China over the CPEC, the flagship project of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as it traverses through Pakistan administrated Jammu and  Kashmir. 

The massive infrastructure project connects China’s Xinjiang province with Gwadar port in Pakistan’s Balochistan province. 

China has been defending the CPEC, saying it is an economic project not aimed at any third country. 

Answering questions on the CPEC at a media briefing on Monday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that the CPEC as one of the pioneering projects under the BRI has made important and major progress in infrastructure, energy, ports and industrial parks. 

He said the Belt and Road Initiative is an open international economic cooperation initiative with objectives of enhancing regional connectivity and achieving common development. 

"We are also extending the CPEC to regional countries, including Afghanistan. This will not only boost faster economic development in Pakistan, but also regional connectivity," he said. 

Asked how China sees regional prosperity being furthered by the CPEC in view of India’s position that it passes through Indian territory illegally occupied by Pakistan, Zhao said the project has not affected China’s principled position on Kashmir. 

"China has stated its principled position on Kashmir many times. The CPEC is an economic initiative that targets no third country. It is not about territorial disputes and does not affect our principled position on the issue of Kashmir,” he said. 

On the CPEC''s extension to Afghanistan, he said, "on third party participation in the CPEC, China is having discussions with third parties, including Afghanistan". 

"The two sides are having consultations through diplomatic channels. We notice that Afghanistan imports and exports goods through Gwadar and Karachi ports. High-speed highways are also being extended to Afghanistan,” he added. 

In a message to his Pakistani counterpart Arif Alvi on Friday on the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the China-Pakistan diplomatic relations, President Xi Jinping said the CPEC has achieved remarkable results. 

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan said at a high-level meeting in Islamabad that the CPEC will bring economic progress not only to Pakistan but the entire region.

LAWMAKERS GRIEVED GRAVES

Tuesday, September 27, 2011 was just a routine day of business in the history of state assembly. The issue of unmarked graves dominated Day 2 of the brief autumn session. Just how did the lawmakers grieve over the anonymous graves that dot the troubled state’s landscape?

House resumes at 10:00 hours and Speaker Mohammad Akbar Lone finds Ms Mehbooba Mufti and other PDP lawmakers on their toes. She started impressing upon the chair that their adjournment motion be accepted because the unmarked graves report of SHRC is highly sensitive. For the last one and a half months, she said, nobody in our country opened his mouth on this issue. These graves are not in Africa. Unlike British parliament, our parliament did not discuss it. There are 3000 graves, she said.

Lone says he is equally concerned as son of the soil but is bound by the House rules. “Heavens would not fall if you suspend the routine business and permit the discussion,” Ms Mufti said. “Let this house send a message out that it is concerned.”

The argument for rules and their suspension went on. Molvi Iftikhar Ansari, Muzaffar Hussain Beig, Javed Mustafa Mir, Rafi Ahmad Mir, Nizam-ud-Din Bhat and many others intervened. The Speaker stuck to his guns. In between there were heated exchanges. Some lawmakers from Jammu even suggested a separate PDP-NC house. At one point of time, the Speaker suggested to Ms Mufti that “we all are equally blamed for whatever has happened and you (read PDP) can not escape unscathed.” In the end, the question hour was almost over and the Speaker finally ruled: “I reject it.” The PDP brigade walks out, never to return for the day.

The House takes up the short duration discussion at around 12:15 hours. Mir Saifullah, one of NCs best debating lawmakers, starts his speech. The official gallery is empty. State Police Chief, Chief  Secretary, Additional DG, Home Commissioner – all are out. Almost all the ministers are out, probably clearing files or busy in meetings in their allotted rooms in the House building. The opposition is now restricted to BJP and Panthers Party.

“Had Kashmir issue been solved, we might have not been counting the graves now,” Mir started. He talks of UN resolutions, agreements between India and Pakistan and finally picks up the threads of turmoil from 1989. From Hawal massacre he moves to Handwara and then offers certain specific instances of those gone missing. “There is no place where there is no graveyard,” he said and mentions Master Ali Mohamad, Wali Mir, Roug Shah and a young bridegroom who was blown to death and whose family got just a few kilograms of his body.

He talks about some specific killings that took place during the earlier PDP government. Mir sees a hope in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and talks between India and Pakistan. In between there is a verbal duel between BJP’s Ashok Khjuria and NC Kafil-Ur-Rehman. As Mir starts concluding his almost 40 minutes long speech, Chief Minister, Law and Finance Ministers are back on their benches, so is an officer in the official gallery.

Congress’s Ashok Kumar takes over. “There is requirement of reconciliation and rehabilitation,” the lawmaker says. He says the issue of unmarked graves is humanitarian and not political. He wants a commission to look into it. NC’s Aijaz Ahmad Jan talks about Master Mumtz of his area who was detained and is missing with an enquiry still on. Insisting that there were such graveyards in his area as well and demands chief minister to announce a commission so that people get justice.

Congress’s Mohammad Sharief Niyaz said TRC should happen. He wants a holistic view of the issue that should take care of the people who have gone across and settled on the other side of the LoC. There are skeletons being recovered from forests. “There is requirement for a complete investigation from all angles,” he said.

It was Kafil-Ur-Rehman, NC’s Karnah MLA who stunned the house. “In our area there are so many gorges where there are many hundred skeletons,” he said. It was his reference to the two brothers who went out and never came back when he mentioned again: “There is a gorge that is 1000 ft deep and people have seen crows hovering around there.”

He says the “un-natural division” has led to a series of massacres in his area – 5000 people in one snowstorm and 4000 people in the wars of 1965 and 1971 and 6000 others who led in shelling for all these years. “But some people have taken the contract of exploiting the issues,” he said and ended by reciting the famous couplet about a victims plight of where he will trace his killer because the assassin has used the hand-glouse!!

Nazir Gurezi who represents another border belt talks about Mufti Sayeed’s appointment by Jogmohan who, he alleged, spearheaded massacres in Kashmir. Then he bashes Ms Mufti for praising Modi. He mentions the killing of six persons by Mufti’s guards and finally ends with the suggestion of a commission that will take care of things from 1990.

Panthers Party’s Harsh Dev Singh while expressing concern over the issue of unmarked mass graves said that the matter should be probed properly and truth must come out. “It seems we are playing politics over dead bodies,” he said. “It is a grave issue and we should see the other side of the picture as well.”

BJP’s Ashok Khajuria expressed concern and raised the issue of Kashmiri pundits who , he alleged, were brutally killed by the militants. He specially mentions Sarla Bhat, who, according to him was killed on a band saw. His speech was interrupted by many lawmakers from the treasury benches. “If you can listen from barrister Mehmood Choudhary, why cannot you listen to me,” Khajuria said. “You people are fed by India and you conspire against her.”

It was the turn of the chief minister Omar Abdullah to wind up the debate. He started with the attack on opposition, which he believes is raking up issues for scoring political points. “These graves belong to 1990-2006 era and we could have easily said that we are not contributors to it so we are not responsible but we cannot say that,” he said.

Omar talked about a “disinformation and misinformation” campaign that gives an impression as if Kashmir is Cambodia or Nazi Germany. Almost reprimanding his party men for ‘mixing up many issues’ and ‘creating problems’ by generating a wrong impression, Omar said there were no mass graves. He made a particular reference to Kafil-Ur-Rehman, a lawmaker from border area of Karnah. “You better go and inform the SHRC,” an angry Omar told Rehman when the latter started explaining his utterances.

“Let me make it clear there are no mass graves,” Omar said. “There are graves carrying one body each though in a few there are more than one body which have been buried as per the Islamic rites.” He said these are unmarked graves and that is not very different from whatever happens in the periphery where people usually avoid having tombstones.

Hundreds of people, Omar said, having gone across the LoC for training have settled there and the state government with MHA is making efforts to get the willing ones back. He maintained that a large number of disappeared persons are living normal lives across the border but they still exist as disappeared persons here. He said there might have been a number of persons who might have been killed in the training camp mishaps, which is normal even in regular military training academies.

Omar said every killing cannot be attributed to the security forces. Recently, some surrendered Hizb militants led the security forces to a forest where they had killed and buried two civilians and they were there for the last seven years. “We are holding security forces responsible for everything and we are condemning them well before they are proven guilty,” he asserted.

It was at the peak of his speech that chief minister reiterated that the recommendations made by the SHRC investigation on the unmarked graves issue would be implemented. The government cannot suppress the truth. “Families having their persons missing should go and lodge an FIR with our human right cell and deposit their DNA samples,” Omar said. “The families would have to help us indicating in which graveyard they suspect their member could be buried so that we will do the needful.” He, however, insisted that this cannot happen overnight.

Already, he said, work had started correlating the FIRs registered with the police with the graves. He termed the task difficult because there are many conflicting numbers about graves in circulation. He referred to Poonch where 2500 such graves are reported to exist. Police records suggest the security forces have killed 2136 militants in that area of whom 2090 are foreigners. “They are buried there but they are foreign militants,” Omar said.

He referred to the recent instance in Gurez where seven of the 14 militants, whose names are not known, where buried. “Right now, we know who are buried in Gurez but after 20 years these could become other unmarked graves,” he asserted. Militants from 12 countries, Omar said, including Russia, Chechnya, Sudan, Pakistan, Britain and Afghanistan have been killed in encounters in J&K and their graves do exist here.

Putting the death toll of civilians in the state since 1990 at 17000, Omar said the people have a right to seek answers about their loved ones. “There would be some uncomfortable questions but we have to respond to them,” Omar said.

On the utopian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), Omar said it is possible only if India and Pakistan cooperate. “We need to know how many youth who had gone for training were killed while handling arms,” Omar said asking if Islamabad can ever offer details. “They pushed their regulars into Kargil and when they were killed they never identified them. How can they help in giving us these details now?”
For more details: 

http://www.kashmirlife.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=15&Itemid=163

'LeT strike in India can destabilise S Asia, threaten US'

Lavetra cashmeriana

Washongton, 25 May: Another major  attack in India by the Lashkar-e-Tayiba has the potential to destabilise the region, a powerful American lawmaker has said, adding that this Pakistan-based  outfit has increased its threat potential to the United States too, reports Rediff.

"This group (LeT), responsible for the vicious Mumbai attacks of 2008, is capable of not only destabilising the region with another attack against India, but through its extensive alumni organisation and network of training camps throughout Pakistan, it could threaten the United States homeland," said Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Lashkar-e-Tayiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad continue to launch attacks that may spark a war between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan, he said.

Testifying before the committee, Christina Fair, an eminent expert of the region, said that Pakistan has raised and nurtured a number of militant groups, Lashkar-e-Tayiba being just one, to operate in India and in Afghanistan.

"These are distinct from the Pakistani Taliban, which has been ravaging the state, although part of the Pakistan Taliban does draw personnel from rebel erstwhile proxies," she said.

"Lashkar-e-Tayiba draws most of its recruits from Deobandis and other sectarian groups. This allows them to indoctrinate them into this worldview, and since it deploys relatively few people to Kashmir, this is an important part of its domestic outreach mission," Fair said.

China Gives Pakistan 50 Fighter Jets

JF-17 Fighter

ISLAMABAD, May 19 : Pakistan — China has agreed to immediately provide 50 JF-17 fighter jets to Pakistan, a major outcome of a visit by Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani to Beijing this week, Pakistani officials said Thursday, reports New York Times.

China and Pakistan have jointly produced the JF-17 aircraft, but the new planes would be equipped with more sophisticated avionics, the officials said. The latest jet fighters would be paid for by China, they said.

The announcement came as Pakistan’s already tense relations with the United States soured further after the killing of Osama bin Laden deep inside Pakistan on May 2.

Last week, Pakistan’s spy chief denounced the United States in a rare briefing before Parliament in which he condemned the American raid for breaching Pakistan’s sovereignty. Parliament, in turn, called for the government to revisit relations with the United States.

Mr. Gilani’s visit to Beijing served as a pointed reminder of Pakistani suggestions that the government might seek to recalibrate relations with the United States, using China to offset what many here view as an overdependence on Washington.

The United States has provided Pakistan with some $20 billion in aid, mostly military, for its cooperation in fighting terrorism since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Much of that aid has come in the form of reimbursements for Pakistani counterterrorism operations.

Both the aid and the effectiveness of Pakistan’s cooperation have been called into question by the discovery that Bin Laden had lived for years in a large compound adjacent to a top military academy in the city of Abbottabad, a two-hour drive from the capital, Islamabad.

While the Obama administration would still like Pakistan’s cooperation to wind down the war in Afghanistan and to root out terrorist groups, some American lawmakers are now calling for aid to Pakistan to be cut or suspended.

For their part, Pakistani officials were incensed that the Obama administration gave them no notice of the raid until helicopters bearing a Navy Seal team had already left the country.

Mr. Gilani’s four-day visit to China may help Pakistan as it tries to regain leverage with the United States. During his visit, Mr. Gilani met with Premier Wen Jiabao of China, who bolstered Pakistan by saying the United States should respect Pakistan’s sovereignty.

The news about the JF-17 aircraft is clearly a signal that Pakistan is shopping for alternatives to Washington, though the value of the deal may be more symbolic than decisive in terms of Pakistan’s military capacity.

Pakistani military officials have consistently complained that American aid, which they would nonetheless like to keep flowing, falls short on many essential military items that the Americans have been reluctant to offer.

The United States provides Pakistan with F-16 fighter jets to help the country match the air power of its archrival India, but Pakistani military officials have complained that their F-16 fleet is aging.

The deal is another sign that Pakistan’s relations with China are frequently far less encumbered than those with the United States, and that in many ways the interests of Pakistan and China coincide more easily.

The United States may be Pakistan’s largest benefactor, but China is Pakistan’s largest trading partner, and for years the Chinese have heavily invested in building a deep-water port in the Pakistani city of Gwadar.

China is often referred to as Pakistan’s “all-weather friend,” a contrast to the common depiction of its up-and-down relationship with the United States, which is deeply unpopular here.

The United States has invested in a special relationship with India. Both China and Pakistan, on the other hand, view India as a rival. They share an interest in containing India’s regional influence, particularly as the United States draws down its forces in Afghanistan, a process the Obama administration says it will start this summer.

At a landmark meeting on April 16 in the Afghan capital, Kabul, top Pakistani officials suggested to Afghan leaders that they, too, needed to look to China, an ascendant power, rather than align themselves closely with the United States, according to Afghan officials.

“You couldn’t tell exactly what they meant, whether China could possibly be an alternative to the United States, but they were saying it could help both countries,” an Afghan official said afterward.

UAE issues stapled visa to Kashmir residents

Srinagar, 05 May:The United Arab Emirates has begun issuing "stapled visas" to Kashmir  residents, including its "Prime Minister" Sardar Attique Ahmed, a media report said on Thursday.

The practice of issuing "stapled visas" is new and previously visas were stamped as usual on the passports, the Pakistan Observer newspaper reported on Thursday.

PaK "Prime Minister" Sardar Attique Ahmed Khan, who holds a Pakistani diplomatic passport, was issued a stapled visit visa by the UAE Embassy in Islamabad on Tuesday, the report said.

China had sparked a diplomatic row with India last year by issuing stapled visas to residents of Jammu and Kashmir.

Chinese troops on Jammu and Kashmir : Gen Parnaik

Srinagar , Apr 6 : China’s presence in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK)is “increasing steadily” and its troops are “actually present” along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir, a top Army Commander said, adding the Chinese footprints are “too close for comfort” for India.

“Chinese presence in Gilgit-Baltistan and the Northern Areas is increasing steadily. There are many people who are concerned about the fact that if there was to be hostility between us and Pakistan, what would be the complicity of Chinese. Not only they are in the neighbourhood but the fact that they are actually present and stationed along the LoC,” Northern Army Commander Lt Gen K T Parnaik said here recently while addressing a seminar.

He said China’s links with Pakistan through Azad Jammu and Kashmir “lends strength” to the “nexus” between the two countries which is a cause of “great security concern” for India.

“As part of (China’s) ‘strings of pearls’ policy, Chinese footprints are too close for comfort,” Parnaik added.

The Army Commander said such a ‘nexus’ between the Chinese and Pakistani military “jeopardises our regional strategic interests in the long run and facilitates speedy and enhanced deployment of Pakistan armed forces to complement China’s military operations and thus outranks India.”

He said China has been found to be involved in the construction of numerous roads and several hydro-power projects inside Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Beijing is laying a web of roads that run across areas as distant from each other as Skardu in Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Kunming in China near Myanmar border.

China has already constructed roads connecting all its highways to logistic centres and major defence installations that dot the border with India and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-eastern Jammu and Kashmir.

US-NATO-JEWIS WAR: 'US Drones Kill 938 Pakistanis in 2010'

By: Sheikh GULZAAR
Srinagar, March 20 : The US has stepped up its drone attacks in Pakistan's tribal areas bordering Afghanistan, a new report by a Pakistani Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) says.

The Islamabad-based NGO, Conflict Monitoring Center, revealed the details of the deaths by US drone attacks in its annual report.

The report gives detailed accounts on how the CIA killed innocent people merely on the suspicion of being militants.

In 2010, the CIA carried out an unprecedented 132 drone attacks in tribal areas, claiming the lives of 938 people, it said.

The Conflict Monitoring Center points out that none of the media organizations throughout last year reported on body counts from independent sources.

Many analysts believe the geo-strategic game plan of the US has turned out to be counterproductive.

The year 2010 was one of the deadliest years for civilians living in the tribal regions, as the number of drone strikes exceeded the combined number of such attacks carried out from 2004 to 2009.

The report states that 2,052 people lost their lives in drone strikes during the 5-year period between 2004 and 2009. The rising civilian causalities have left behind many tragic stories in the tribal areas.

The reaction of Pakistani people against the frequent use of drone strikes is finally gathering momentum. In the worst of several US air strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan in recent days, up to 51 civilians were killed last Thursday in Afghanistan’s north-eastern Kunar province. General David Petraeus, the commander of the US forces in Afghanistan, expressed the colonial-style hostility of the occupation force’s senior command toward the Afghan population, reportedly accusing local residents of burning their children to fake evidence of civilian casualties.

In a five-hour operation on the night of February 17, US Apache helicopters strafed a group of alleged Afghan insurgents with gunfire, rockets and Hellfire missiles. Surveillance drones guided the helicopter assault in the mountainous district of Ghaziabad, near the Pakistan border, and according to the Washington Post, bombs were dropped by at least one of the unmanned Predator aircraft. The attack was one of a number of recent US operations in the district, ordered as part of President Barack Obama’s broader escalation of the Af-Pak war.

Rear Admiral Gregory Smith, senior military spokesman in Kabul, stated that three dozen people were killed in the incident. He maintained they were all “suspected insurgents who had gathered to attack US and Afghan troops”. However, the remarks of one unnamed military official, cited by theWashington Post on Monday, made clear that American authorities had no knowledge of the identities of those killed. The official admitted that those targeted had been wearing civilian clothes.

Kunar Governor Said Fazlullah Wahidi contradicted Smith’s claims. He said: “According to our information 64 people were killed: 13 armed opposition, 22 women, 26 boys and 3 old men.” The governor sent a three-man “fact-finding team” to the area on Saturday, which returned with seven injured people suffering burns and shrapnel wounds, including a young man and woman and five boys and girls.

Dr. Asadullah Fazli, chief doctor at the provincial hospital in Asadabad, the capital of Kunar, told the New York Times that the hospital had treated at least nine wounded from the area, including three women, four children and two men. One two-year-old girl had to have her leg amputated because of shrapnel injuries. The Times noted: “There were several other military operations in the area over the last few days, so it was not clear which one caused those injuries.”

In an attempt to defuse outrage among the Afghan population over the latest atrocity carried out by the occupation forces, President Hamid Karzai issued what has become a pro forma denunciation of American military operations. He stated that “about 50 civilians have been martyred” and pledged to send investigators to the scene of the killings.

Karzai met with his national security council and General Petraeus at the presidential palace in Kabul on Sunday. According to an account of the meeting published in the Washington Post, “Petraeus, the top US commander in Afghanistan, dismissed allegations by Karzai’s office and the provincial governor that civilians were killed and said residents had invented stories, or even injured their children, to pin the blame on US forces and force an end to the operation.”

One unnamed participant in the meeting said: “He claimed that in the midst of the [operation] some pro-Taliban parents in contact with a government official decided to create a civilian casualty claim to pressure international forces to cease the [operation]. They burned hands and legs of some of their children and sent them to the hospital.”

The discussion demonstrates the contempt with which the American military command regards Karzai, the figurehead first installed as Washington’s stooge shortly after the 2001 invasion.

The Washington Post reported that Karzai and his colleagues found Petraeus’s baseless allegations “deeply offensive” and “shocking”. One official declared: “Killing 60 people, and then blaming the killing on those same people, rather than apologising for any deaths? This is inhuman. This is a really terrible situation.”

Petraeus declined to respond to the published account of his meeting with the Afghan president. The day after his provocative remarks on the Kunar killings, more Afghan civilians were killed in a US air strike. In Qilgha village in Nangarhar province, immediately south of Kunar, a missile destroyed a family’s home, killing the parents and four children aged between three and eight who had been sleeping inside. The father, named Patang, was a member of the Afghan national army.

A provincial official told the AFP news agency that American forces had targeted three insurgents planting mines on nearby road, but had hit the home by mistake. NATO spokesmen confirmed there had been civilian casualties, but said no further details would be released, pending an investigation.

One village resident told Pajhwok Afghan News that foreign forces intercepted a vehicle taking the wounded father to hospital, halting it for two hours. “The troops beat us and tied our hands,” the man, Psarlay, said. “Meanwhile, Patang died because of excessive bleeding.”

Another resident, 26-year-old Ezatullah, told the Wall Street Journal: “The house was completely destroyed by the strike. Only two children [aged] four and six survived.” He added that “thousands of people attended the funeral of the slain family Monday and are planning a protest against coalition forces Tuesday”.

A report issued February 1 by the Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM) tallied at least 2,421 civilian deaths and 3,270 injuries inflicted last year by US-NATO forces, Taliban and resistance groups, and Afghan government police, soldiers, and militia. The violence in 2010 was the worst since the invasion a decade ago. The real casualty rate for civilians is likely to be significantly higher than the ARM tally, with US-NATO forces routinely covering up their crimes and labelling victims as “insurgents” or “terrorists”.

 The Obama-Petraeus counter-insurgency strategy effectively centres on the use of overwhelming force against the population, aimed at crushing continued resistance to the occupation of the resource-rich and strategically vital country. At the same time, the Obama administration has illegally extended the war into Pakistan, with US ground forces active in the border region near Afghanistan, backed by a steady bombardment of CIA drone missile attacks.

On Sunday and Monday, two drone attacks killed a reported 12 people. In the first incident, seven alleged militants were killed —including, according to Pakistani intelligence agents cited by various media outlets, an Iraqi Al Qaeda operative—after multiple missiles struck a house in the tribal agency of South Waziristan. Five more alleged militants were killed the next day in North Waziristan.

These operations mark the resumption of US drone attacks after a four-week pause—the longest period in which Pakistan had not been hit by American missiles since December 2009. The temporary cessation was widely believed to have been connected with Washington’s efforts to secure the release of CIA agent Raymond Davis, arrested on January 27 in Lahore on murder charges. Obama’s bombings have generated enormous anger among ordinary Pakistanis, and destabilised the government in Islamabad. The US government is nevertheless proceeding, underscoring the ruthlessness of its Af-Pak war.

An article in the Washington Post on Monday pointed to the indiscriminate character of the missile strikes. It explained that at least 581 alleged militants had been killed by drones in Pakistan last year, but just two of the victims had been previously listed on the US list of “most wanted” terrorists.

 “Despite a major escalation in the number of unmanned Predator strikes being carried out under the Obama administration, data from government and independent sources indicate that the number of high-ranking militants being killed as a result has either slipped or barely increased,” the Washington Postexplained. “Even more generous counts—which indicate that the CIA killed as many as 13 ‘high-value targets’—suggest that the drone program is hitting senior operatives only a fraction of the time.”

The article noted that drones were no longer restricted to striking known targets. Anyone in Pakistan witnessed doing something deemed suspicious, such as travelling to or from alleged terrorist-controlled buildings, could be killed by CIA assassins, operating the drones from Langley, Virginia.

China shows Aksai Chin as its own

Details: http://jkmpic.blogspot.com

Beijing, Jan 19 : China today officially launched its state-run mapping website that rivals Google Earth, showing Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin in Jammu and Kashmir -- two key areas of dispute with India --  as part of its territory, K J M VARMA reports in Greater Kashmir 18/1.

The map called ‘Map World’ displayed on the Internet in Chinese language is already being used in I phone and other mobile and Internet user applications in China.

It shows Arunachal Pradesh that China has always claimed as “southern Tibet” as part of its territory. The map makes no specific mention of southern Tibet but it shows China’s borders covered up to Arunachal Pradesh.

Also, the Aksai Chin area, which India asserts as part of Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir has been included by the map as part of China’s Xinjiang province. Both areas are part of the border dispute being negotiated between the two countries, which so far have held 14 rounds of talks.

The map, however, displays the Line of Control (LOC) in Kashmir region acknowledging the both sides of the areas respectively under the control of India and Pakistan.

The unresolved border issue has been a simmering issue in Sino-India relations for a long time.
 The issue of Arunachal was in the news again this month after two residents of the state were issued stapled visas by China, a development which observers said could be an indication of a change in Beijing’s policy. China had earlier refused to offer visas to the residents of the state.

However, China reiterated yesterday that its policy that Arunachal Pradesh is a “disputed area” remains “unchanged”.

The online mapping service called MAP WORLD is meant to offer an “authoritative, credible and unified” online mapping service, state-run Xinhua news agency reported.

Kashmiri leaders plan visit to China, IRAN

Srinagar, Nov 21: Encouraged by China and Iran’s recent stand on Kashmir, both factions of Hurriyat Conference are planning to visit the two countries to mobilize their ‘permanent’ diplomatic support towards resolution of the Kashmir issue.

As part of the process, the chairmen of the two factions will meet the envoys of the two countries during their scheduled visits to New Delhi in coming days.

“A visit to Iran and China will not only strengthen our movement on diplomatic front but will help us to garner more international support for resolution of Kashmir issue. Like Pakistan, we have to garner support from these countries to pressurise India to resolve the Kashmir issue amicably and according to UN resolutions,” Hurriyat (G) chairman Syed Ali Geelani told Rising Kashmir.

He said during his planned visit to New Delhi he would be meeting the envoys of China and Iran. “I would meet the ambassadors of the two countries to formulate a proper mechanism for a formal visit,” Geelani said adding, “A permanent support for the implementation of UN resolutions will strengthen our long-pending demand for Right to Self Determination to allow Kashmiris to determine their fate”.

He, however, said any visit to these countries will be subject to the issuance of travel documents by the Indian authorities.

The Hurriyat (M) chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq also said that his conglomerate is working on diplomatic front for such a visit. “International support for Kashmir is must and we will surely visit these countries whenever such an opportunity comes. We are working on such things and as a first step we would be meeting the envoys of China and Iran during my scheduled visit to Indian capital in the coming weeks,” Mirwaiz said.

He said China’s stand on Kashmir has always been encouraging and the recent statement by Iranian spiritual leader on Kashmir is a beginning of support building process on international level for resolution of Kashmir issue. “To garner the support permanently, visits to these countries is necessary and must,” he said.

The Hurriyat (M) chairman said the senior conglomerate leader Aga Syed Hassan has been frequently visiting Iran, apprising its leaders about the Kashmir situation and its implications on the peace and stability of the region.

He said he has a standing invitation from a Chinese NGO and plans to visit Iran as well in the near future.

Why Kashmiris observe October 27 as Black Day!

by M Raza Malik
Kashmiris on both sides of the Line of Control and across the globe observe October 27 as Black Day and consider it as the blackest day in the history of Kashmir. This is the Day when India landed its army in Jammu and Kashmir, in total disregard to the Indian Independence Act and Partition Plan in 1947.

In order to change the demographic composition of the territory, Indian troops, the forces of Dogra Maharaja Hari Singh, and Hindu extremists massacred over three hundred thousand Kashmiri Muslims within a period of two months.

The Indian Independence Act and Partition Plan of 1947 had stated that the Indian British Colony would be divided into two sovereign states, India, with Hindu-majority areas, and Pakistan, with the Muslim-majority areas of Western provinces and east Bengal.

India by landing its Army in Jammu and Kashmir violated the guidelines set for deciding the future of Hyderabad, Junagarh and Kashmir, three of the independent Princely States at that time, which were given the choice to either accede to Pakistan or India, considering the geographical situation and communal demography. It forcibly occupied the Hyderabad and Junagarh, which had Hindus in majority but their rulers were Muslims. Kashmir was a Muslim-majority state and had a natural tendency to accede to Pakistan, but its Hindu ruler destroyed the future of Kashmiri people by announcing its accession to India under a controversial accession document (Instrument of Accession). Many neutral observers deny the existence of such document with the argument that had it been there Indian government had made it public either officially or at any international forum.

It is a historical fact that if the partition was done on the principles of Justice then India had no land route to enter into Jammu and Kashmir but the so-called Boundary Commission, headed by British Barrister, Cyril Radcliff, that demarcated partition line, under a conspiracy split Gurdaspur, a Muslim majority area, and handed it over to India, providing it terrestrial access to the territory.

Right from the day one, the people of Kashmir did not accept India's illegal occupation and started an armed struggle with the total support of public in 1948, which forced India to approach the UN Security Council to seek help of the World Body to settle the dispute. The UN Security Council through its successive resolutions nullified Indian invasion and occupation of Kashmir. It also approved a ceasefire, demarcation of the ceasefire line, demilitarization of the state and a free and impartial plebiscite to be conducted under the supervision of the World Body. Although the ceasefire and demarcation of the ceasefire line was implemented while demilitarization of the occupied territory and a free and impartial plebiscite under UN supervision remain unimplemented till date. As a result of the demarcation, about 139,000 square kilometers area of Jammu and Kashmir remained with India while 83,807 square kilometers constituted the territory of Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Indian rulers promised before the UN to resolve the dispute and provide the people of Kashmir with their basic right of self-determination, but later backed away from their commitments. India has been putting peace, security and stability of the entire South Asia at stake by demonstrating continued rigidity and stubbornness and not responding positively to the efforts made by the international community to settle the Kashmir dispute during the last more than six decades.

Disappointed at the failure of all the efforts aimed at resolving the Kashmir dispute through peaceful means, the people of occupied Kashmir launched a massive uprising in 1989 to secure their right to self-determination. This movement gathered momentum with the passage of time and pushed the Indian authorities to wall, forcing them to sit around the negotiation table with Pakistan in January 2004. The talks process continued till it was hampered after Mumbai attacks on November 26, 2008, when India without any substantive evidence laid the responsibility of these attacks on Pakistan and its intelligence agencies. However, Prime Ministers of the two countries, Yousuf Raza Gilani and Manmohan Singh after a meeting at Sharm El-Sheikh, on July 16, 2009, in a joint statement declared to resume the composite dialogue process to resolve all outstanding issues.

It is worth mentioning that Pakistan demonstrated considerable flexibility in the dialogue process by floating various proposals including demilitarization, self-governance and joint-management to settle the conflict over Kashmir, but India's intransigent approach continued to remain the biggest hurdle in making successful any effort made in this regard. The ground situation in the occupied territory remains unchanged, as the confidence building measures and the dialogue process could not provide Kashmiri people respite from the Indian state terrorism.

India has exhausted all its resources and means but has not been able to deter Kashmiris from continuing their liberation struggle. It has given a free hand to its troops and police to subject peaceful protesters to brute force. Over 70 people were killed only within a period of two months in 2008 when Indian police personnel resorted to indiscriminate firing to break up demonstrators in Kashmir. The Chairman of All Parties Hurriyet Conference, Mirwaiz Umer Farooq was placed under house arrest for two months to prevent him from addressing public gatherings. Liberation leaders including Syed Ali Gilani, Shabbir Ahmed Shah, Aasiya Andrabi, Nayeem Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Ashraf Sehrai, Masarat Alam Butt and Muhammad Saleem Nunnaji have been booked under the infamous draconian law, Public Safety Act to keep them away from the people. The troops have been setting new records of human rights violations by killing innocent people, arresting youth, disgracing and harassing women and setting residential houses afire with impunity.

The troops have killed over ninety-two thousand Kashmiris, widowed more than twenty five thousand women, orphaned more than one hundred thousand children and molested or gang-raped around ten thousand Kashmiri women during the past 20 years. The whereabouts of thousands of innocent Kashmiris, disappeared in the custody of troops, are yet to be made known while hundreds of unnamed graves have been discovered in the occupied territory, which are believed to be of disappeared Kashmiris. This whole mayhem is being carried out with the protection of draconian laws, by virtue of which any person can be killed or put behind the bars without any accountability.

The All Parties Hurriyet Conference sources made a shocking revelation recently that in line with a new scheme, Indian troops were killing innocent Kashmiri youth in fake encounters in the areas near the Line of Control after arresting them from different parts of the occupied territory. According to the APHC sources through these killings India wanted to mislead the international community by propagating that Kashmiri youth were trying to enter Indian occupied Kashmir after crossing over the Line of Control.

The Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Asia Watch and other international humanitarian organizations in their regular reports over the unabated rights abuses in the occupied territory have been raising their concern. Even the European Union Parliament during its session in Strasbourg on July 10, 2008 unanimously passed a resolution calling upon the Indian Government to urgently conduct an independent and impartial probe into the issue of discovery of mass graves in the territory. It also strongly condemned unlawful killings, enforced disappearances, torture, rape and other human rights abuses, which have been taking place at the hands of the occupation troops in Jammu and Kashmir since 1989.

It was yet another exposition of India's callousness that the Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh on India's Independence Day, this year, tried to hoodwink the international community by stating that the elections in Kashmir had rendered the freedom element irrelevant. To protest this unrealistic statement Kashmiri people observed crippling strike on August 22. Pakistan's Foreign Minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi while addressing a meeting of Kashmiri leaders on September 4, 2009 in Islamabad categorically emphasized that the elections in Indian occupied Kashmir could not be a substitute of Kashmiris' right to self-determination. He reaffirmed his country's moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmir liberation movement. The mammoth anti-India protest demonstrations, participated by millions of people in Indian occupied Kashmir, last year, should be taken as Kashmiris' referendum against the Indian illegal occupation of their soil.

These are the reasons that why Kashmiris observe October 27 as Black Day. The observance is intended to send a loud and clear message to the international community to take cognizance of the miseries of Kashmiri people, help stop human rights violations in the occupied territory and play its role in bringing about a solution of the Kashmir dispute in accordance with Kashmiris' aspirations. It is also aimed at calling upon India to read writing on the wall, accept the ground realities and come forward with a realistic approach to settle the dispute for the larger interest of the people of the region.

(The writer is working as Senior Editor at Kashmir Media Service, Islamabad, and can be reached at razamalik849@yahoo.com) 

Will Kashmir lead to war with China ?

Bangalore, October 5: Will the current explosion in Kashmir ultimately lead India to another war with China? Reports say ruling “Jews of India” have been asked by the Jews to widen the conflagration so that China, which is already in the “Pak-occupied Kashmir”, is provoked to intervene through Pakistan. India may then seek US support, reports  Dalit Voice  (5/9)

The staple food of the Jews and “Jews of India” has been war and violence to establish world domination. Having been defeated in their experiment in Iraq and Afghanistan, they are now trying to shift the scene to Asia and confront China with the help of the “Jews of India”.

Our sources say if there is such a direct confrontation between US and China it will lead to World War-III with Russia, Iran and the entire Muslim world. Dangerous days are ahead.

Nato regrets Pak troop deaths, urges route re-opening

ISLAMABAD/BRUSSELS: Nato chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen expressed regret on Monday for the deaths of Pakistani soldiers last week and said he hoped Pakistan’s border would reopen for NATO supplies to Afghanistan as soon as possible, reports Jumg (5/9./2010)

Angered by repeated attacks by Nato helicopters on militant targets within its borders, Pakistan blocked one of the supply routes for Nato troops in Afghanistan after a strike killed three Pakistani soldiers in the western Kurram region.

Analysts and Western officials said Pakistan’s closure of the border for a few days would not seriously impact the war effort in Afghanistan, but it would create political tension that Pakistan could exploit.

“I expressed my regret for the incident last week in which Pakistani soldiers lost their lives,” Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said after meeting Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi in Brussels. “I expressed my hope the border will be open for supplies as soon as possible.”

The apology came after gunmen attacked a convoy of trucks taking goods to Western forces in Afghanistan on the outskirts of Islamabad, killing three guards. The foreign minister while apprising the Nato secretary general of the gravity of public anger over Nato incursions said that Pakistan would only reopen the supply route for coalition troops in Afghanistan once public anger eases and security improves. “Unless the reaction cools down and we make sure that the supply line is secured, we cannot reopen it,” the foreign minister added. He further said the UN mandate for Isaf is confined to Afghanistan and Nato/Isaf forces are again advised to refrain from any actions that constitute a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

Foreign Minister Qureshi did not hold a press conference after the meeting. Hours later, suspected militants attacked trawlers carrying supplies for Nato through Balochistan, killing one man, police said.

Pakistan has officially said the border has been closed for security reasons and the Taliban threat of more attacks will likely prolong the closure of the vital supply route — now in its fifth day — and further strain ties with ally Washington, which has long demanded Pakistan crackdown on militants. “Efforts are underway to resolve this issue, but there is a lot of anger in Pakistan about the border incursion,” a senior Pakistani government official told Reuters.

ISAF spokesman Major Joel Harper told Reuters in Kabul that the border closure wouldn’t impact the mission, but that the supply lines are “an important element of the Pakistani economy. It’s important to our logistics stocks”. The closures would force more supplies through NATO’s northern supply route through Russia and the central Asian republics, he said. “Nato authorities have all along anticipated disruptions in the supply chain and have been stockpiling supplies in advance,” said Kamran Bokhari, South Asia director at STRATFOR global intelligence.

Andrew Exum, a fellow with the Center for a New American Security and former adviser on Gen Stanley McChrystal’ assessment team in Afghanistan, said the closures mattered little tactically.

“Even though it’s painful it doesn’t cripple the mission,” he said. “The larger strategic issue is that we’re seeing a period of rising public tension between the United States and Pakistan.”

“It’s clear the Pakistanis are frustrated with the United States,” he continued. “It’s clear the Pakistanis are frustrated with the drone strikes in Pakistan. What I don’t think the Pakistanis understand is how frustrated the Americans and the American public are with the Pakistanis.”

Rasmussen said the killing of the three Pakistani soldiers was unintended and showed the need to improve coordination between the NATO and the Pakistani military. He said a joint investigation was under way. “It is important we step up our cooperation,” he said. —Agencies

Mariana Baabar adds: Meanwhile, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), when contacted, said it cannot confirm the identity of two planes that hovered inside Pakistani airspace at the time when Nato helicopters were striking a Pakistani checkpost. A private television channel showed the footage of the incident in which for the first time the presence of these two planes came to light.

China will spit on Brahminist face

Chinese and Pakistan soldiers hail the victory

Brother Mleccha is right that Jews and Brahmins are not brothers. We had said this in our book, Brahminism (DSA-2002). While the Jews hated Hitler and his nazis, the Brahmins supported and admired Hitler. They even invited him to India, report Dalit Voice (1/9/10).

The Brahmin symbol, swastika, was given to Hitler. A German scholar at Oxford University, Max Mueller, got the whole Brahmin “Sacred Scriptures” translated to English and published then. Germans took great interest in Sanskrit.

JEWS AS VICTIMS OF BRAHMINS

Hitlerism and the Brahmin terrorist party, RSS, aims and objectives are the same (Ibid DSA p.54). Germany’s outstanding philosopher, Nietzche, praised Brahmins.

Leon Poliakov, a distinguished French (Jew) historian, in his book, The Aryan Myth (1977, New American Library, New York) says Jews were the victms of Brahminism. The Jews engineered both the 1st and 2nd World Wars to fight Hitler and finally defeated him but Brahmins fully supported Hitler and the nazis. All this is history. All the thinking Jews know this historical truth during our meetings in US, London and Paris.

It is only after the collapse of Soviet Russia, the Brahmins started courting the Jews. And making a beeline to USA. But all the brilliant Jews are fully aware of the Brahminist treachery.

Brahmins are carefully watching the world situation. They know, the US led by Jews is collapsing. They also know China which hates Jews is rising. As the saying goes the Brahmin is a good servant but a bad master.

Their fear is once the US loses and Jews are finished there is no use hugging on to Jews.

They are carefully watching the rising China and our information is they have already started licking the Chinese bum.

Informed sources say they have already sent emissaries to Beijing to touch the feet of Chinese leaders and seek their forgiveness for the 1962 war against China. But we have already made sure that China would spit on the face of the crooks — EDITOR.

China rejects defeated Brahminist offer to surrender

Bangalore: As China is fast emerging as a super power, overtaking USA, India’s Brahminical rulers continue to generate more hate against China, sheltering the notorious Dalai Lama and adding fuel to fire. Nehru, India’s first Brahmin PM, was a bogus socialist who engineered the war against China (1962) in which India was utterly defeated and ate dust. Thousands of innocent Indian soldiers died, reports in Dalit Voice (September 1-15,2010)

Good servant but bad master: The common masses of India (85%) have no say in the governance of the country but they have nothing against China. It is the Brahminist rulers (15%) who have fought with every neighbour around India, headed by the super power China which has become the darling of all the have-nots of the world. But in contrast the rulers have made India the most hated country.

During our recent visit to London and Paris (July 2010) and discussions with intellectuals familiar with this subject, particularly Brahminism, the curse of India, a new fear is being expressed.

Many experts on the subject of Brahminism say the Brahmin is a good servant but bad master. If you are strong, the Brahmin will lick your boot. But if you are weak he will crush you and suck your blood. Yes. Indian history proves this.

Annie Besant as Cong. president: Applying this logic to China, which is fast emerging as the sole super power of the 21st century, what will be the stand of Indian Brahminist rulers vis-a-vis China?

The fear expressed during our discussions was the Brahminists — scenting danger to their very existence — might quickly reverse their policy and start courting if not bum-licking the Chinese leaders.

Fears of the Western experts are based on the Brahminical behaviour during the British rule which they bitterly hated because it brought about justice, rule of law and introduced English education system - which threatened their very hegemony. In Madras, the Brahmins started the Hindu English daily to fight the British-owned Madras Mail.

Brahmins supported Hitler: Brahmins invited a notorious rejected British woman, Annie Besant, and made her the president of the National Congress, the party of the Brahmins, to fight the British rulers. They even courted Hitler, invited him to India, promising a red-carpet welcome, travelled to distant Germany, supplied their swastika emblem and made them fight the British.

Darling of the British: Though the Jews and the “Jews of India” are cousins, the two fell into opposite camps: The Jews hating Hitler and Brahmins loving the nazi Germany (Read our book, Brahminism, DSA-2002, photocopy available, Rs. 100).

Hitler’s forces even bombed London and the British, the sole super power of the day, was about to be defeated in the World War-II. But the Jews had a better strategy. They blackmailed the US to support British and join the World War in which Germany was finally defeated.Scenting the danger the Brahminists quickly changed sides and started praising the British and hailing Churchill, the war-time British PM. They have no permanent enemy but only permanent interests.

Will Brahminists surrender to China: They never keep all their eggs in one basket. They will be always with the victors. They quickly endeared themselves to the British, as by then they have already mastered the English language.

The Gujarati Bania as their fondest slave, they quickly managed to become the darling of the British. And then managed through the Jewish Viceroy, Mountbatten, the partition of India. The “Jews of India” finally won.

During our discussions abroad with experts on the Jews and “Jews of India” fears were expressed if the history would repeat in the case of China. Will the Brahminists surrender to their today’s enemy (China) so that their tomorrow will be sure and secure ?

But will the Chinese, firmly rooted in their centuries-old philosophy, who had the courage to rebuff their own ideological-mate, Soviet Russia, be fooled by the Brahminist rulers? Will the Brahminists shamelessly apologise for their 1962 war and their continued the enemity for decades?

China has already became the best friend of all the Brahminist enemies surrounding India: Pakistan, Kashmir, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma, Lanka, Maldives. China has completely encircled India.

China hated Jews: No doubt all these enemies of Brahminist rulers will prevail upon China not to give scope to the “Jews of India”. China never allowed the Jews, who brought communism to Russia, to infiltrate its country. Chairman Mao and Premier Chou En-lai were fully aware of the menace of the Jews and also the ‘Jews of India”.

But in war and love — and politics too — there is nothing like a permanent enemy or friend. The Brahminist “Jews of India”, know how and when to stoop to conquer. Did they not give their wives, sisters and daughters to Muslim rulers? All this is part of history. Chanakya’s Arthasastra asks the Brahmin to stoop to conquer.

So we will not be surprised if the Brahminists try to build bridges and skyways to cross into China and bum-lick China.

But during our discussion, we firmly assured our friends that China will never, ever yield. And our predictions are firmly rooted in Chinese history.(Dalit Voice)

China rejects defeated Brahminist offer to surrender : Bahujans must embrace new super power

Bangalore: (India) As China is fast emerging as a super power, overtaking USA, India’s Brahminical rulers continue to generate more hate against China, sheltering the notorious Dalai Lama and adding fuel to fire, reports DV, September 1-15,2010.


Nehru, India’s first Brahmin PM, was a bogus socialist who engineered the war against China (1962) in which India was utterly defeated and ate dust. Thousands of innocent Indian soldiers died.

Good servant but bad master: The common masses of India (85%) have no say in the governance of the country but they have nothing against China. It is the Brahminist rulers (15%) who have fought with every neighbour around India, headed by the super power China which has become the darling of all the have-nots of the world. But in contrast the rulers have made India the most hated country.

During our recent visit to London and Paris (July 2010) and discussions with intellectuals familiar with this subject, particularly Brahminism, the curse of India, a new fear is being expressed.

Many experts on the subject of Brahminism say the Brahmin is a good servant but bad master. If you are strong, the Brahmin will lick your boot. But if you are weak he will crush you and suck your blood. Yes. Indian history proves this.

Annie Besant as Cong. president: Applying this logic to China, which is fast emerging as the sole super power of the 21st century, what will be the stand of Indian Brahminist rulers vis-a-vis China?

The fear expressed during our discussions was the Brahminists — scenting danger to their very existence — might quickly reverse their policy and start courting if not bum-licking the Chinese leaders.

Fears of the Western experts are based on the Brahminical behaviour during the British rule which they bitterly hated because it brought about justice, rule of law and introduced English education system - which threatened their very hegemony. In Madras, the Brahmins started the Hindu English daily to fight the British-owned Madras Mail.

Brahmins supported Hitler: Brahmins invited a notorious rejected British woman, Annie Besant, and made her the president of the National Congress, the party of the Brahmins, to fight the British rulers. They even courted Hitler, invited him to India, promising a red-carpet welcome, travelled to distant Germany, supplied their swastika emblem and made them fight the British.

Darling of the British: Though the Jews and the “Jews of India” are cousins, the two fell into opposite camps: The Jews hating Hitler and Brahmins loving the nazi Germany (Read our book, Brahminism, DSA-2002, photocopy available, Rs. 100).

Hitler’s forces even bombed London and the British, the sole super power of the day, was about to be defeated in the World War-II. But the Jews had a better strategy. They blackmailed the US to support British and join the World War in which Germany was finally defeated.Scenting the danger the Brahminists quickly changed sides and started praising the British and hailing Churchill, the war-time British PM. They have no permanent enemy but only permanent interests.

Will Brahminists surrender to China: They never keep all their eggs in one basket. They will be always with the victors. They quickly endeared themselves to the British, as by then they have already mastered the English language.

The Gujarati Bania as their fondest slave, they quickly managed to become the darling of the British. And then managed through the Jewish Viceroy, Mountbatten, the partition of India. The “Jews of India” finally won.
During our discussions abroad with experts on the Jews and “Jews of India” fears were expressed if the history would repeat in the case of China. Will the Brahminists surrender to their today’s enemy (China) so that their tomorrow will be sure and secure ?

But will the Chinese, firmly rooted in their centuries-old philosophy, who had the courage to rebuff their own ideological-mate, Soviet Russia, be fooled by the Brahminist rulers? Will the Brahminists shamelessly apologise for their 1962 war and their continued the enemity for decades?

China has already became the best friend of all the Brahminist enemies surrounding India: Pakistan, Kashmir, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma, Lanka, Maldives. China has completely encircled India.

China hated Jews: No doubt all these enemies of Brahminist rulers will prevail upon China not to give scope to the “Jews of India”. China never allowed the Jews, who brought communism to Russia, to infiltrate its country. Chairman Mao and Premier Chou En-lai were fully aware of the menace of the Jews and also the ‘Jews of India”.

But in war and love — and politics too — there is nothing like a permanent enemy or friend. The Brahminist “Jews of India”, know how and when to stoop to conquer. Did they not give their wives, sisters and daughters to Muslim rulers? All this is part of history. Chanakya’s Arthasastra asks the Brahmin to stoop to conquer.

So we will not be surprised if the Brahminists try to build bridges and skyways to cross into China and bum-lick China.

But during our discussion, we firmly assured our friends that China will never, ever yield. And our predictions are firmly rooted in Chinese history. (DV)

‘Youths have given fresh lease of life to movement’ WAR QUESTIONS MIRWAIZ’S ‘UNITY’ MOVE

Srinagar, Sep 06: PPP Chairman Engineer Hilal Ahmed War has questioned Hurriyat (M) Chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq’s hollow unity initiative terming it as mere political stunt. War said that Kashmiris who are laying down their lives for the attainment of right to self-determination cannot be fooled by such gimmicks. “More than sixty youths have been martyred by police and paramilitary for raising their voice against Indian occupation and nobody would be allowed to play with their blood,” said War adding “I think Mirwaiz hasn’t done enough homework or else it is some foreign idea which Mirwaiz wants to experiment.” War said that unity shouldn’t be restricted to three people offering Eid namaaz. “Such trinity shows can’t be used to hoodwink the masses.  These are mere photo-ops and the pro-freedom leadership needs to be more practical,” said War.

“It is beyond me why Mirwaiz called All Parties Meeting at Mirwaiz Manzil Rajouri Kadal in the month of June if his definition of unity is bringing just two more people in confidence. Confining the effort to three  people and barring other pro-freedom parties and genuine resistance forces is highly questionsable,” said War.

He said that the resistance movement has reached the decisive phase and the Kashmiri youths are doing a commendable job by taking it out from mosques and shrines by reaching out to the world through all possible means. “From internet resistance to street resistance, Kashmiri youths have given a fresh lease of life to the movement spilling their blood for the attainment of the right to
self-determination,” said Er Hilal War.

He said Mirwaiz needs to refrain from such futile, childish exercises and try to understand the dynamics of Kashmir issue.

कश्मीर के ज्यादा के नियंत्रण में चीनी सेना (Chinese army in control of much of Kashmir)

श्रीनगर, 28 अगस्त चीन वीजा एक सेवारत भारतीय सेना महाप्रबंधक को मना कर दिया है कि वह भूमि है पर, जम्मू और कश्मीर के विवादित राज्य में भारतीय सेना के प्रभारी.चीन एक विवादित क्षेत्र के रूप में किया गया है जम्मू और कश्मीर का वर्णन. बीजिंग के लिए लेफ्टिनेंट जनरल बी एस जसवाल की यात्रा की अनुमति देने से इनकार कर दिया सेना के जनरल आफिसर कमांडिंग इन चीफ, उत्तरी कमान के क्षेत्र में.पिछले कुछ वर्षों के लिए एक अभ्यास के साथ रखने में, भारतीय रक्षा प्रतिष्ठान जून में था एक नियमित रूप से उच्चस्तरीय आदान प्रदान की चीन यात्रा इस साल अगस्त के लिए उत्तरी एरिया कमांडर द्वारा तैयारियाँ शुरू किया. 

", एक श्रीनगर स्थित सैन्य विश्लेषक हिलाल अहमद युद्ध जो मुजफ्फराबाद से हाल ही में लौटे की शर्त पर आजाद Jamuu और कश्मीर (ए जे) के क्षेत्र की एक बड़ी पथ चीनी पीपुल्स लिबरेशन आर्मी (पीएलए) के प्रभावी नियंत्रण के तहत अब है" कहा गुमनामी. 

विकास "भारत अपने उत्तर पश्चिमी सीमा पर सुरक्षा हितों, दूर" एक वीसा के चीन के इनकार पर एक चीनी चाय "कप में लेफ्टिनेंट जनरल बी एस जसवाल को तूफान से भी अधिक के लिए भारी" महत्व रखती है, उन्होंने कहा.भारतीय अधिकारियों का कहना है कि वे पूरी तरह आजाद जम्मू और कश्मीर में चीनी सैनिकों की उपस्थिति के बारे में पता. विदेश मंत्रालय के एक प्रवक्ता ने शुक्रवार को भारत के मीडिया को बताया: "हम PoK.We में गतिविधियों के बारे में पता कर रहे हैं स्पष्ट रूप से कहा कि जम्मू और कश्मीर के पूरे राज्य भारत का एक हिस्सा है और किसी भी गतिविधि है हमारी अनुमति के साथ जगह ले जाना चाहिए." 

यह पूछने पर कि सरकार विशेष रूप से किया गया था चीनी सेना और सड़कों के निर्माण में अन्य एजेंसियों की उपस्थिति के बारे में पता, उन्होंने कहा: "हम इसे जानते हैं और हम बना दिया है हमारे विचारों में जाना."चीनी प्रतिक्रिया के बारे में पूछे जाने पर उन्होंने कहा, "हम स्पष्ट स्थिति और चीनी बनाया है के बारे में जानते हैं."वीजा के इनकार, भूमि जसवाल कि जम्मू और कश्मीर के परिचालन कमान में था जो चीन विवादित क्षेत्र मानता है, पर शुक्रवार को भारत से एक मजबूत प्रतिक्रिया उकसाया. चीनी राजदूत ने विदेश मंत्रालय और वीजा के लिए बुलाया गया था कुछ चीनी सैन्य कर्मियों के लिए मना कर दिया. Demarches भी बीजिंग के लिए भेजा गया था करने के लिए लेफ्टिनेंट जनरल जसवाल के लिए एक वीजा के इनकार के विरोध में. 

चीन पिछले परिचालित एक 'देश भारत से अलग कश्मीर चित्रण नक्शे में है, और controversially राज्य से यात्रियों के लिए वीजा प्रदान stapled. कुछ विश्लेषकों का कहना है कि चीन के नवीनतम उत्तेजना के बीच आता है अन्य सीमाओं पर चीनी की बढ़ती मुखरता संकेत. , योनातन Holslag, समकालीन चीन अध्ययन और के लेखक की ब्रुसेल्स संस्थान में अनुसंधान साथी कारणों "यह कहना मुश्किल है कि यह कैसे निर्णय चीन जटिल नौकरशाही द्वारा किया गया था, लेकिन यह एक समय आता है, जब बीजिंग विभिन्न क्षेत्रीय विवादों में अपनी मांसपेशियों flexing है" चीन और भारत: शांति के लिए संभावनाओं. 

, Holslag नोट "जाहिर है, चीन अरुणाचल प्रदेश पर संघर्ष में दांव upped है, लेकिन अब कश्मीर में भी फिर से एक सौदेबाजी चिप और एक महत्वपूर्ण रणनीतिक गलियारे के रूप में शोहरत के लिए बढ़ रहा है." चीन उन्होंने कहा, "तेजी से निर्माण और जल प्रबंधन परियोजनाओं के सभी प्रकार में दिखाई आजाद जम्मू और कश्मीर में."अन्य विश्लेषकों चीन पिन विज़ pricks-A-विज़ कश्मीर और उसके-the-भूमि में पाकिस्तान की गतिविधियों पर अपनी पश्चिमी सीमा के साथ व्यस्त रखने के लिए भारत की रणनीति के हिस्से के रूप में, और चीन से दूर देखें.", जॉन ली, स्वतंत्र अध्ययन के लिए सिडनी स्थित केंद्र में विदेश नीति अनुसंधान साथी और हडसन संस्थान में अतिथि साथी का कहना है कि चीन एक दशक से अधिक के लिए लगातार रणनीति के लिए भारत विचलित रखने के उत्तर की ओर कर दिया गया है". 

ली का मानना है कि वीजा के इनकार चीनी सामरिक हलकों में एक "धारणा के लिए बंधे हो सकता है कि भारत चीन के 'हाल के वर्षों के दृष्टिकोण के नरम - और, सकारात्मक विपरीत पर जवाब नहीं था, अमेरिका और दक्षिण के देशों के साथ साथ सामरिक संबंधों को मजबूत पूर्व एशिया. " 

चीनी सामरिक हलकों में भारत के साथ चीन के रिश्ते की एक "सख्त लिए पिचिंग हैं क्योंकि उनका मानना है कि वे बहुत खोना नहीं है, क्या दिया पिछले कुछ वर्षों में हुआ है." 

चीन का मानना है कि भारत में ज्यादा होता जा रहा है और दक्षिण पूर्व एशिया में रणनीतिक रूप से मुखर है, वह कहते हैं. लंदन में वेस्टमिंस्टर विश्वविद्यालय के प्रोफेसर Dibyesh आनंद बाहर हाल के वर्षों में वहाँ चीन के "मुख्य राष्ट्रीय हितों की तीखी अभिव्यक्ति किया गया है, और कश्मीर में कील के" परिवर्तन "- अगर सरकारी नीति के रूप में की पुष्टि की -" हिस्सा हो सकता है कि अंक इस अभिकथन "भारत., आनंद कहते हैं, स्पष्टीकरण ही नहीं लेनी चाहिए जनरल वीजा के इनकार पर है लेकिन जम्मू और कश्मीर पर चीन की स्थिति पर. 

"जब चीन का कहना है कि भारत को बार बार चीन के हिस्से के रूप में तिब्बत स्वायत्त क्षेत्र की अपनी मान्यता पुनरावृति, वहाँ कोई कारण है कि भारत एक समान स्पष्टीकरण प्राप्त नहीं कर सकता है." और अगर वे कहते हैं, चीन के विवादित क्षेत्र के रूप में पूरे जम्मू कश्मीर विचार, " भारत को अपने पूरे चीन नीति पर पुनर्विचार की जरूरत है - क्योंकि यह स्पष्ट रूप से भारत के आंतरिक मामलों में हस्तक्षेप और एक पाकिस्तान के साथ द्विपक्षीय संबंधों में हो जाएगा. " 

लेकिन ताजा प्रकरण से परे लग रही है, आनंद का कहना है कि भारत चीन सीमा विवाद के एक संकल्प के लिए महत्वपूर्ण है. "दोनों देशों के बीच सहयोगात्मक संबंध इतना जब तक सीमा विवाद ज़िंदा है के लिए गिनती नहीं". होगा और उसके आकलन में, सीमा विवाद न केवल सामरिक प्राथमिकताओं लेकिन अधिक महत्वपूर्ण बात के बारे में राष्ट्रवादी narratives के बारे में "है." इन narratives में, चीन एक "परेशानी, अमेरिका के साथ काम करने के लिए तैयार एक देश के रूप में भारत को देखता है. नुकसान के लिए चीन के" भारत, दूसरी तरफ, "के रूप में देखता है कुटिल चीन और पाकिस्तान के साथ मिलकर काम."और भारतीय और चीनी नेताओं का कहना है, आनंद, "इन narratives राष्ट्रवादी बदलने में कोई रुचि नहीं दिखाई है." 

Holslag कि "के रूप में चीन सामरिक क्लौस्ट्रफ़ोबिया की बढ़ती भावना के साथ संघर्ष कर रही है के रूप में ज्यादा है, अन्य शक्तियाँ क्या वे चीन की बढ़ती मुखरता के रूप में अनुभव के बारे में fretting रहे हैं. मानना है कि" ये सुरक्षा दुविधाएं वे कहते हैं, "अधिक दबाव एक क्षेत्र में हो जाएगा, जहां की शेष राशि बिजली की तेजी से बदलने के लिए, खासकर जब क्षेत्रीय हितों को दांव पर लगा रहे हैं. " 

, Holslag का कहना है कि भारत नवीनतम उत्तेजना, "वृद्धि प्रबंधन करने के लिए प्रतिक्रिया के लिए के रूप में महत्वपूर्ण है." भारत वह नोट, "कुछ यात्राओं को रोकने के द्वारा अनुपात प्रतिक्रिया नहीं दी है. जबकि ट्रैक पर सबसे अधिक सैन्य आदान रखने" लेकिन साथ जारी रखा "पाकिस्तान पर तकरार, व्यापार विवादों proliferating, सीमा वार्ता में पदों सख्त है, और राष्ट्रवाद बढ़ रही है," भारत चीन उन्होंने गिनाते संबंधों "बन तेजी से करने के लिए मुश्किल का प्रबंधन करेगा. (Writer-South Asia)

चीन वैश्विक नेता के रूप में उभर

Hilal Ahmad War

चीन वैश्विक नेता के रूप में उभर
वापस जाने के लिए भारत कश्मीर में आंदोलन जाओ

द्वारा: हिलाल अहमद युद्ध
श्रीनगर, 20 अगस्त: विभाजन से पहले वहाँ के बारे में ब्रिटिश भारत में एक दर्जन से अधिक प्रांतों, प्रत्येक स्थानीय ब्रिटिश वाइसराय के समग्र नियंत्रण के तहत राज्यपाल का शासन था. वहाँ भी कुछ केन्द्र शासित प्रदेशों दिलाई. ब्रिटिश क्राउन भी छह सौ से अधिक उन्हें और ब्रिटिश भारत सरकार के बीच एक संधि के तहत एक अजीब Paramountcy रियासतों का आनंद लिया. प्रत्येक रियासत सार में एक संप्रभु देश है जिसमें ब्रिटिश भारत सरकार ने अपने आधिकारिक ब्रिटिश राष्ट्रपति के रूप में नामित राजदूत तैनात था. इन सभी राज्यों को संचार और ब्रिटिश भारतीय सरकार को विदेशी मामलों की व्यवस्था दी थी. भारतीय स्वतंत्रता अधिनियम July1947 जो 15 जुलाई 1947 की 18 वीं पर शाही अनुमति है पर पारित किया गया था जिसमें से पुण्य ब्रिटिश उपनिवेश में भारत के दो यानी भारत और पाकिस्तान का विभाजन हुआ द्वारा. धारा 7 (ख) भारतीय स्वतंत्रता अधिनियम, 1947 के भाग मैं कश्मीर के महाराजा के एक शासक के रूप में प्राधिकार रहता है. एक ही धारा 7 (के गुण से ख का IIA-1947) ब्रिटिश भारत सरकार और रियासतों के शासकों के बीच सभी संधियों को रद्द कर दिया गया. इसलिए भारतीय उप महाद्वीप के सभी रियासतों स्वतः ही उनके पूर्ण और स्वतंत्र संप्रभु दर्जा वापस पा ली थी. धारा 7 (के गुण से ख) भारतीय स्वतंत्रता अधिनियम की अवाप्ति गैरकानूनी है, अवैध और असंवैधानिक है और अंतर्राष्ट्रीय कानून के उल्लंघन में. विलय के दस्तावेज जम्मू और कश्मीर राज्य का विषय (राष्ट्र द्वारा हस्ताक्षर किए गए थे), अपनी निजी क्षमता में अर्थात् हरि सिंह और के रूप में एक शासक नहीं de-jure.That कारण है तो राज्यपाल जनरल डोगरा है वापस करने के लिए लिखा है कि प्रवेश के लिए है हो पुष्टि करने के लिए डाल दिया. जम्मू और कश्मीर भंडार के संविधान आजाद जम्मू और कश्मीर के लिए विधानसभा की 24 सीटें. कोई संवैधानिक संशोधन नहीं होगा जब तक उन लोगों को पूरा कर सकते हैं. यहां तक कि भारत के साथ राज्य के तथाकथित परिग्रहण ही सादृश्य पर उचित नहीं ठहराया जा सकता है. परिग्रहण के अनुसमर्थन साधारण कारण यह है कि डोगरा 15 अगस्त 1947 को जब्त शासन के लिए आवश्यक है.

चीन कश्मीर के लोगों की आकांक्षाओं का सम्मान करता है. चीन एक विवादित क्षेत्र जो बहुत सराहनीय है के रूप में कश्मीर को पहचानने द्वारा अपने विवेक प्रदर्शन किया है. चीन की भूमिका प्रशंसनीय है और एक नई विश्व व्यवस्था की दीक्षा. कश्मीर एक शांतिपूर्ण दुनिया और आपसी सह अस्तित्व की नींव रखी है पर चीनी रुख. चीन न केवल उपमहाद्वीप में है लेकिन दुनिया के इतिहास में के मौलिक अधिकार को पहचानने के द्वारा एक नया अध्याय खोला गया है दीन. इस महान और ऐतिहासिक निर्णय की गतिशीलता warmongers के लिए भानुमती का पिटारा खोल दिया है और यह शांति प्रेमियों और विचारकों के बीच विश्व स्तर पर एक बहस खोल दिया है. यदि बराक ओबामा के एक बदलाव चाहता है, वह अपने विशेष रूप से सामान्य में और चीन दुनिया की दिशा बदलने के विदेश नीति और चीन के अच्छे इरादों को समझना चाहिए. इस ऐतिहासिक और साहसिक निर्णय संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ में बहस होनी चाहिए. इस बहस विश्व शांति के लिए एक सुरंग है जिसके लिए कुंजी कश्मीर समस्या के समाधान में निहित है खुलेगा. यदि बराक ओबामा के हाल के बयानों पर यकीन किया जाए, तो डर है कि अमेरिका चीन अमेरिकी वर्चस्व के लिए खतरा है बिना एक अच्छे दोस्त के रूप में चीन को समझना होगा. संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ में चीन के निर्णय चीन और अमेरिका और अमेरिका की दोस्ती एक विश्व नेता De-विधिवत रूप में उभरने जाएगा बहस. रास्ते चीन संयुक्त राष्ट्र चार्टर के सिद्धांतों को कायम रखने सुनहरा है और कड़वी गोलियाँ जो अंतरराष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा के हित में संयुक्त राष्ट्र के चार्टर से उत्पन्न, निगल शांति और न्याय. वर्तमान वैश्विक परिदृश्य दुनिया में नेतृत्व की भूमिका के प्रति चीन ले जाता है. वैश्विक घटनाओं जगह ले जा रहे हो इतनी जल्दी है कि दुनिया एक बार फिर सोवियत रूस के पतन के बाद द्विध्रुवी बनने की ओर अग्रसर. चूंकि चीन महत्वाकांक्षी नहीं है एक महाशक्ति लेकिन हालात अंततः दुनिया नेतृत्व है जो दुनिया पर शक्ति संतुलन की दिशा में जाएगा चीन का नेतृत्व करेंगे बनने के लिए.

के तुरंत बाद चीनी सेना लद्दाख, दो दुनिया की ताकतवर पर्वत श्रृंखला के से घिरा भूमि - महान हिमालय और काराकोरम में घुसपैठ की थी - दोनों पक्षों ने फिर से एक राजनयिक विवाद में शामिल हैं, पर इस समय चीन के निवासियों को अलग वीजा जारी कश्मीर के. वे वीजा अरुणाचल प्रदेश, जिस पर चीन अपनी संप्रभुता दावों के निवासियों को पहले दी stapled है कार्रवाई अधिकारियों द्वारा नई दिल्ली में चीन द्वारा एक प्रयास के लिए भारत के हिस्से के रूप में जम्मू और कश्मीर की स्थिति के सवाल के रूप में देखा जाता है.. कश्मीर से कई लोग भारत और वीजा की प्रकृति पर चीन की लड़ाई के रूप में असहाय छोड़ दिया गया है भारतीय अधिकारियों कश्मीर के निवासियों के लिए विशेष वीजा जारी करने वाले चीनी की एक नई प्रथा पर बीजिंग के साथ आधिकारिक विरोध दर्ज किया है. सामरिक मामलों के विश्लेषक, ब्रह्मा Chellany और आचार्य सहमत थे कि वीजा जारी अभी तक चीन द्वारा एक और प्रयास करने के लिए रणनीतिक कारणों की एक किस्म के लिए दबाव में भारत को किया गया था. "चीन को खोल रहा है विभिन्न मोर्चों पर दबाव अंक के लिए रक्षात्मक" पर भारत में कहें, Chellany कहा.

आचार्य लगा चीनी रणनीति एक इतना है कि यह तक नहीं शाफ़्ट अन्य मुद्दों करता कोने में भारत लंबे समय से खड़ी सीमा विवाद या तिब्बत की तरह, धकेलने के उद्देश्य से किया गया था. दलाई लामा की आगामी अरुणाचल प्रदेश में तवांग को चीन की यात्रा करने के लिए जो दावा किया है, विवाद की जड़ है है और बीजिंग नई दिल्ली के लिए कहा है यह बंद बुलाया है.

चीन अरूणाचल प्रदेश के निवासियों के लिए दिया गया है stapled वीजा जारी करते हुए कहा कि उत्तर पूर्वी भारतीय राज्य है, जो चीन के एक हिस्से का दावा एक विवादित क्षेत्र है और कहा कि इसके मूल निवासी हैं "चीनी". विदेश मंत्री एसएम कृष्णा को अपने चीनी समकक्ष यांग च्येछी भारत की यात्रा करने के लिए 26-27 अक्टूबर साथ इस मुद्दे को उठाने की संभावना है, शीर्ष सूत्रों ने आईएएनएस को बताया. यांग यहाँ भारत के विदेश मंत्रियों, चीन और रूस, जो बंगलौर में आयोजित किया जाएगा की त्रिपक्षीय बैठक में भाग लेंगे.

चीन के वीजा नीति केवल कूटनीतिक विवाद नहीं उभर आए हैं लेकिन एक स्पष्ट संकेत है कि बीजिंग जम्मू और कश्मीर की स्थिति पर भारत का अभिन्न भाग के रूप में भारत की सरकारों द्वारा दावा के रूप में आरक्षण दिया है देता है.

, चीनी वीजा जारी करने के लिए हाल ही अंतरराष्ट्रीय ध्यान आकर्षित करने के लिए विकास "यह कश्मीर के लोगों की है कि चीन, संयुक्त राष्ट्र सुरक्षा परिषद का स्थायी सदस्य, एक विवादित क्षेत्र के रूप में किया गया है जम्मू और कश्मीर स्वीकार करने के लिए एक नैतिक जीत है नहीं है" कश्मीर मुद्दा. पीपुल्स राजनीतिक पार्टी (पीपीपी) के एक सहयोगी और कश्मीर का एक सामरिक भागीदार के रूप में चीन पहचानता है. चीन एकमात्र देश है जो संयुक्त राष्ट्र चार्टर के सिद्धांतों का अनुसरण और सुनहरा plebiscite संयुक्त राष्ट्र द्वारा पारित प्रस्तावों को मान्यता प्राप्त है. चीन कश्मीर के विवादित राज्यों पहचानने से एक बहुत ही कानूनी स्थिति को ले लिया गया है और हिम्मत जुटाई कश्मीरियों के लिए विशेष वीजा जारी करने से इस दिशा में व्यावहारिक कदम उठाए. Muammer Qadafi, लीबिया के नेता, उसके संयुक्त राष्ट्र महासभा में भाषण के पाठ्यक्रम में था, 23 सितंबर, ने कहा कि कश्मीर एक स्वतंत्र राज्य की जानी चाहिए. "हम इस संघर्ष को समाप्त करना चाहिए. यह भारत और पाकिस्तान के बीच एक बाथ राज्य किया, "कहा जाना चाहिए लीबिया के नेता से एक बयान है कि कश्मीरी नेताओं और दलों के लिए प्रोत्साहित किया ही नहीं बल्कि उसे स्थानीय प्रशंसकों जीता. एक बैठक में इस्लामिक कांफ्रेंस (ओआईसी) के संगठन, संयुक्त राष्ट्र महासभा सत्र के मौके पर न्यूयॉर्क में आयोजित की, ने कहा कि यह "उनके आत्मनिर्णय के वैध अधिकार की प्राप्ति के अनुसार जम्मू और कश्मीर के लोगों का समर्थन किया संयुक्त राष्ट्र के प्रासंगिक प्रस्तावों और कश्मीरी लोगों की आकांक्षाओं के साथ ". 56 सदस्यीय समूह भी अपनी सहायक महासचिव नियुक्त किया, अब्दुल्ला बिन अब्दुल रहमान अल Bakr, एक सऊदी राष्ट्रीय, कश्मीर पर अपने संपर्क समूह के संयुक्त राष्ट्र मुख्यालय में एक बैठक के बाद कश्मीर पर विशेष दूत. यूनाइटेड जिहाद काउंसिल, कश्मीरी स्वतंत्रता समूहों के एक गठबंधन, चीन की नई वीजा नीति का स्वागत करता है, कश्मीरी नागरिकों के लिए और कहा कि चीन, एक विशाल क्षेत्रीय शक्ति होने के नाते, एक "निर्णायक" भूमिका के लिए कश्मीर मुद्दे को हल करने में खेलने के लिए है.

एम.जे. अकबर, एक अनुभवी भारतीय पत्रकार और लेखक है, लेकिन कहा कि चीन भारत के साथ युद्ध नहीं चाहता था, लेकिन व्यापार, जो अब अमेरिका के लिए करीब 60 अरब डॉलर है. "वहाँ एक तर्कसंगत कारण है कि चीन को भारतीय बयानबाजी और सीमा पर उत्तेजक अपने इशारों दिल्ली दूतावास में और के माध्यम से और कमजोरियों का फायदा उठाने का फैसला किया है विरोधाभास है. यह करने के लिए शेष भारत से दूर रखना चाहता है, यह सीमा तक, अपने सहयोगी पाकिस्तान के अस्तित्व के लिए बहुत परेशानी का एक समय में, कर सकता है "उन्होंने कहा. इस समय वहाँ के लिए बीजिंग और इस्लामाबाद द्वारा एक समन्वित प्रयास करने के लिए भारत धमकाना घटनाओं की बारी तो प्रतीत होता है करने के लिए खोलने के भारत युद्ध के समय और स्थान के बजाय अधिकांश अपने स्वयं के सैनिकों के लिए लाभप्रद होगा चुना जाता है एक असमान प्रतियोगिता में ले जाया जाएगा.

भारतीय रक्षा विश्लेषकों का कहना है, "बहरहाल, साल के इस समय में मौसम की मादक प्रकृति को देखते हुए भारत अपने पड़ोसियों के द्वारा आक्रामक कार्रवाई के लिए तैयार रहना चाहिए. इस बार यह द्वेष के साथ सामंजस्य में हो रहा है पहिले से विचारा हुआ. इसके लिए संकेत दिया गया था जब पाकिस्तानी सेना प्रमुख जनरल अशफाक कियानी बीजिंग का दौरा किया और तब से वहाँ एक धीमी गति से किया गया है लेकिन तनाव की स्थिर वृद्धि, भारत और उसके दो पड़ोसियों. पाकिस्तान और चीन द्वारा बातचीत के लिए कॉल धोखे और उनके अस्थिर भारत के संयुक्त इरादा के लिए छलावरण आतंकवादी और परंपरागत सैन्य रणनीति का एक संयोजन का उपयोग कर रहे हैं. उन दोनों के लिए जेहादी संगठनों है कि संयुक्त जेहाद काउंसिल का गठन उनके भूराजनीति जिसमें पाकिस्तान मोहरा और आतंकवादियों है के आधार हैं उनके proxies रहे हैं. यह कुछ भी नहीं के लिए है कि बीजिंग परमाणु हथियारों और उन्हें देने के लिए मिसाइल के मामले में इतना निवेश किया है नहीं है. पाकिस्तान के परमाणु हथियारों की क्षमता से है, जो ढाल के पीछे आतंकवादी भाला फेंका है. यह कुछ भी नहीं है कि हर अवसर पर पाकिस्तान अपने परमाणु हथियारों की जा रही एक सत्ता पर वीणा चाहिए के लिए नहीं है कि सैन्य टकराव, बहुत जल्दी, एक परमाणु मुद्रा में फूटना सकता है. यह गंजा का सामना करना पड़ा परमाणु बलात्कार विशेष रूप से यह पाकिस्तान की नीति का खुलकर कहा अल्प सूचना पर परमाणु हथियारों का प्रयोग है. "

वहाँ भारत के साथ लड़े सीमा है, और भारत 1962 में चीन द्वारा अपनी हार नहीं भूल गया है एक सीमा पंक्ति में. चीन भी सीमाओं कश्मीर और भारतीय सीमा समझौते चीनी आजाद कश्मीर के अनुभाग पर पाकिस्तान के साथ पहुंचे पहचान नहीं है. हालांकि चीनी और भारतीय पक्ष अपनी सीमा विवाद को हल करने में असमर्थ है, वे फिर भी हाल के वर्षों में करने के लिए सहमत हो गए हैं करने के लिए विभिन्न तनाव को कम करने और नियंत्रण की पंक्तियों के साथ संघर्ष के लिए संभावना उपाय एक भू राजनीतिक बिंदु से है कि उनके दो अलग बलों. देखने के लिए, चीन लगातार भारतीय शक्ति और इसे दक्षिण एशिया क्षेत्र के लिए अनिवार्य रूप से सीमित विवश मांग की है. होने के लिए हिमालय के दक्षिण में एक शक्तिशाली पड़ोसी का सामना नहीं में रणनीतिक हितों के अलावा, चीन तिब्बत में अवशिष्ट भारतीय हितों से चिंतित है. आखिर भारत अभी भी निर्वासन में दलाई लामा और उनके अनधिकृत सरकार harbors. इस प्रकार चीन सिक्किम को भारत के दावों को महत्व देती हैं जारी है, यह बांग्लादेश को प्रोत्साहित करने के लिए भारत और चीन के सब से ऊपर खड़े करने के लिए भारत के कट्टर प्रतिद्वंद्वी पाकिस्तान का समर्थन किया है. 1965 के भारत पाक युद्ध चीन में इतनी दूर चला गया के रूप में भारत के खिलाफ दूसरा मोर्चा खोल धमकी करने के लिए. लेकिन इसकी मुख्य समर्थन हथियारों की आपूर्ति के माध्यम से व्यक्त किया है. चीन पाकिस्तान को मदद करने के लिए परमाणु हथियार और मिसाइल प्रौद्योगिकी हासिल करने से शेष निवारण की मांग की है. एक अंतरराष्ट्रीय परिप्रेक्ष्य से, भारत और चीन शीत युद्ध के दौर में प्रतिद्वंद्वी रहे थे. दरअसल भारत और अमेरिका के मई 2008 में पहली बार संयुक्त सैन्य अभ्यास आयोजित किया. लेकिन चीन के नेतृत्व के उत्तराधिकार के एक समय में अमेरिका के साथ परेशानी से बचने के लिए उत्सुक है, और एक बार जब यह करने के लिए प्रवेश की शर्तों के विश्व व्यापार संगठन समायोजित करने के लिए है पर. इसके अलावा, चीन "आतंकवाद के" युद्ध है, जो इसे अपने प्रतिरोध झिंजियांग के मध्य एशियाई प्रांत में अपने शासन को दबाने के लिए सक्षम है से एक हद तक लाभ हुआ है. फिर भी चीनी आँख सावधानी से मध्य एशिया में अमेरिकी सैन्य उपस्थिति. हालांकि वे है तो सार्वजनिक रूप से नहीं कहा, चीनी बहुत परमाणु हथियारों के संभावित उपयोग करने के लिए विरोध ज्यादा कर रहे हैं.

28 सितम्बर 2009 को, चीन भारत और पाकिस्तान पूछा शांतिपूर्ण और मैत्रीपूर्ण विचार विमर्श के माध्यम से एक हल करने के लिए कश्मीर मुद्दे की तलाश करने के लिए और "मुद्दा द्विपक्षीय समाधान में" एक "रचनात्मक भूमिका" खेलने की पेशकश की. एक मित्र देश होने के नाते, चीन भी भारत और पाकिस्तान के बीच शांति प्रक्रिया में प्रगति देखने के लिए खुश होगा, हू Zhengyue, सहायक विदेश मंत्री के लिए एशियाई क्षेत्र के प्रभारी ने कहा. कश्मीर एक मुद्दा है कि इतिहास से पुराना छोड़ दिया गया है. उन्होंने विदेशी पत्रकारों का दौरा यहाँ के एक समूह को यह मुद्दा प्रासंगिक देशों के बीच द्विपक्षीय संबंधों को छू लेती है "कहा था.

चीन का कश्मीर मुद्दे पर पदों की घोषणा की है चार अलग चरणों के माध्यम से विकसित. 1950 के दशक में, बीजिंग कश्मीर मुद्दे पर एक कम या ज्यादा तटस्थ स्थान बरकरार रखा. 1960 और 1970 के दशक देखा चीन भारत चीन संबंधों के रूप में खराब मुद्दे पर पाकिस्तान के विचारों का जन समर्थन की ओर अपनी स्थिति पाली. 1980 के दशक के बाद से, हालांकि, चीन और भारत के द्विपक्षीय संबंधों के सामान्यीकरण की ओर बढ़ के साथ, बीजिंग तटस्थता की स्थिति भी रूप में यह करने के लिए समर्थन के लिए पाकिस्तान की मांग और एक बेहतर संबंध के साथ विकसित करने में बढ़ती रुचि को संतुष्ट करने की जरूरत के बीच संतुलन की मांग को लौट भारत. 1990 के दशक से, चीन की स्थिति स्पष्ट हो गया कि कश्मीर मुद्दे को द्विपक्षीय भारत और पाकिस्तान द्वारा शांतिपूर्ण तरीके से हल किया जा बात है.

चीन की कश्मीर नीति में अपनी सामान्य दक्षिण एशिया नीति का व्यापक संदर्भों में समझा जाना चाहिए और इस नीति को बीजिंग की वैश्विक रणनीति में फिट बैठता है और भारत और विशेष रूप से पाकिस्तान के साथ अपने द्विपक्षीय संबंधों कहाँ. जबकि अतीत में, बीजिंग कश्मीर मुद्दे पर इस्लामाबाद की स्थिति का समर्थन करने के लिए एक "सभी मौसम" सहयोगी के साथ भारत चीन मनमुटाव और दुश्मनी, नई दिल्ली के साथ सामान्य करने की अवधि के दौरान एकजुटता प्रदर्शित तटस्थता की नीति को अपनाने जरूरी हो गया है कि अनावश्यक alienating से बचने के लिए भारत और फंसाने का खतरा चल रहा है. वास्तव में, जैसा कि भारत और पाकिस्तान दोनों परमाणु हथियार क्षमताओं को प्राप्त कर लिया है, चीन बेहद चिंतित है कि कश्मीर मुद्दे पर संघर्ष का कोई वृद्धि भयानक परिणामों के साथ एक परमाणु विनिमय, तलछट सकता है बन गया है. बीजिंग काफी कश्मीर पर तनाव को कम करने में दिलचस्पी है और इसलिए विशेष रूप से नियंत्रण रेखा के साथ संघर्ष विराम के रूप में हाल के घटनाक्रम के द्वारा प्रोत्साहित किया जाता है, सियाचिन ग्लेशियर विसैन्यीकरण पर रक्षा सचिव की बैठक, नागरिक और उड़ान के उद्घाटन की बहाली कश्मीर के माध्यम से बस सेवा नियंत्रण रेखा के साथ सैन्य उपस्थिति को कम करने पर चर्चा, और सैन्य विश्वास निर्माण के मिसाइल प्रक्षेपण अधिसूचना पर .. समझौते सहित उपाय

चीनी विश्लेषकों का सुझाव है कि भारत और पाकिस्तान दोनों के लिए एक मौजूदा मेल - मिलाप से लाभ बहुत है. लंबे समय तक तनाव और कश्मीर दोनों देशों के लिए मानव और सामग्री के संदर्भ में गंभीर tolls exacted है पर लड़. उदाहरण के लिए, भारतीय सियाचिन ग्लेशियर पर तैनात सैनिकों को बनाए रखने की आपूर्ति नई दिल्ली $ 1 मिलियन एक दिन में खर्च होती है. के बाद से लड़ 1984 में शुरू किया, 2500 में कुछ भारतीय और पाकिस्तानी सैनिकों के 1300 वर्षों में मृत्यु हो गई है, सीधी लड़ाई में इतनी ज्यादा नहीं है लेकिन मौसम और दुर्गम इलाकों की स्थिति का एक परिणाम के रूप में. कश्मीर मुद्दे के प्रबंध नई दिल्ली के लिए आर्थिक विकास के लिए अधिक संसाधनों channeling द्वारा अपनी महान शक्ति क्षमता की पहचान के प्रयास में एक महत्वपूर्ण विचार बन गया है. पाकिस्तान के लिए भी संघर्ष और अधिक संसाधनों consumes. पोस्ट 11 सितंबर क्षेत्रीय सुरक्षा माहौल और अमेरिका के नेतृत्व आतंकवाद पर वैश्विक युद्ध में भी पाकिस्तान के लिए बाहरी दबाव को सीमा पार से आतंकवादी गतिविधियों से निपटने के लिए लागू. बीजिंग भी कश्मीर की अपनी उलझन है, जो मोटे तौर पर अक्टूबर के परिणामस्वरूप 1963 चीन पाकिस्तान सीमा समझौते है की वजह से अधिक विकसित वार्ता में दिलचस्पी है. भारत Ladaakh, कश्मीर में क्षेत्र के भाग के रूप में लगभग 35,000 वर्ग किलोमीटर का चीनी नियंत्रित अक्साई चिन का दावा है. जबकि एक सुदूर संभावना, नई दिल्ली और फिर संप्रभुता सन् 1963 चीन समझौते में पाकिस्तानी सीमा के ऊपर छोड़ दिया मुद्दा खोल सकता इस्लामाबाद के बीच कश्मीर विवाद के एक संकल्प. बीजिंग एक स्थिर दक्षिण एशिया में बढ़ती रुचि को देखकर किया गया है और भारत के साथ बेहतर संबंध की मांग. कि बीजिंग कश्मीर मुद्दे, जो बारी में मजबूती से विश्वास पर आधारित है कि केवल यथार्थवादी लिए कश्मीर विवाद को हल करने रास्ता भारत और पाकिस्तान के बीच शांतिपूर्ण बातचीत के माध्यम से होता है पर अधिक स्पष्ट स्थिति बताते हैं. के रूप में इस्लामाबाद विश्वसनीय दोस्त है, बीजिंग और अपने प्रभाव का इस्तेमाल कर सकते चाहिए पाकिस्तान को समझाने की है कि अपने स्वयं के हित में भी इस मुद्दे को शांतिपूर्वक हल. चीन भी पिछले 40 साल से ज्यादा लद्दाख side.Over से कश्मीर की भूमि के एक टुकड़े पर दावा देता है, चीन अपने ही क्षेत्र के रूप में किया गया है अरुणाचल प्रदेश का दावा. वे वीजा अरुणाचल प्रदेश, जिस पर चीन अपनी संप्रभुता का एक वास्तविक दावा किया है के निवासियों को पहले दी stapled है.

चीन में भी है में इस्लामी अलगाववादियों 'झिंजियांग' झिंजियांग. साथ समस्याओं का सामना करना पड़ रहा है वास्तव में भारतीय अधिकृत कश्मीर में लद्दाख के साथ सीमाओं के शेयरों. इसका आकार 1.8 मिलियन वर्ग किलोमीटर है, लगभग एक चीन की छठी, आधे के रूप में भारत के रूप में ज्यादा. पूर्व अगस्त 1947 जम्मू और कश्मीर के उपायों 2 कुछ, 65,000 वर्ग किमी. जिनमें से कुछ 86,000 वर्ग किमी पाकिस्तान के नियंत्रण में है, चीन के तहत कुछ 37,500 वर्ग किमी, संतुलन, 1, 41,000 वर्ग किमी, भारत के कब्जे में है. कुछ सूत्रों का मानना है कि झिंजियांग में अशांति को हवा दे दी और भारत अमेरिकी गुप्त खुफिया एजेंसियों द्वारा वित्त पोषित है. इस रहस्य एजेंसी तुला हुआ है बनाने के लिए पर 'झिंजियांग चीन के पूर्वी पाकिस्तान. वे उसी तरह के रूप में वे Agartalla षड़यन्त्र के तहत 1971 में किया में चीन बिखर चाहते हैं. तिब्बत में विद्रोह खुले तौर पर भारतीय खुफिया एजेंसियों द्वारा समर्थित है. अमेरिकी हुए और अफगानिस्तान, इराक, और Chechinya और चीन के कुछ भागों में इस्लामी आतंकवाद के खिलाफ रोना, फिलीपीन आदि करने के लिए एक अंधेरे कि इतनी आसानी से उन्हें घातक नेटवर्क नक्शे से नष्ट करने के लिए स्थापित किया जा सकता है में चीन और रूस रखने छलावरण है महान शक्तियों. (Writer-South Asia)
पर और अधिक: विवरण: http://writerasia.blogspot.com