SAARC Youth Award 2010

Announcement for SAARC Youth Award 2010

Islamabad, September 13: SAARC invites applications from the youth of the region to participate in the “SAARC Youth Award - 2010”. The aim of the Scheme is to provide suitable recognition to extra-ordinary young talents and encourage the overall development of the youth in the region.

The theme of the Award - 2010 has been decided as “Outstanding Contribution to protection of Environment and Mitigating Effects of Climate Change”.
For more details:

http://www.saarc-sec.org/2010/08/28/news/Announcement-for-SAARC-Youth-Award-2010/34/

China rejects defeated Brahminist offer to surrender

Bangalore: As China is fast emerging as a super power, overtaking USA, India’s Brahminical rulers continue to generate more hate against China, sheltering the notorious Dalai Lama and adding fuel to fire. Nehru, India’s first Brahmin PM, was a bogus socialist who engineered the war against China (1962) in which India was utterly defeated and ate dust. Thousands of innocent Indian soldiers died, reports in Dalit Voice (September 1-15,2010)

Good servant but bad master: The common masses of India (85%) have no say in the governance of the country but they have nothing against China. It is the Brahminist rulers (15%) who have fought with every neighbour around India, headed by the super power China which has become the darling of all the have-nots of the world. But in contrast the rulers have made India the most hated country.

During our recent visit to London and Paris (July 2010) and discussions with intellectuals familiar with this subject, particularly Brahminism, the curse of India, a new fear is being expressed.

Many experts on the subject of Brahminism say the Brahmin is a good servant but bad master. If you are strong, the Brahmin will lick your boot. But if you are weak he will crush you and suck your blood. Yes. Indian history proves this.

Annie Besant as Cong. president: Applying this logic to China, which is fast emerging as the sole super power of the 21st century, what will be the stand of Indian Brahminist rulers vis-a-vis China?

The fear expressed during our discussions was the Brahminists — scenting danger to their very existence — might quickly reverse their policy and start courting if not bum-licking the Chinese leaders.

Fears of the Western experts are based on the Brahminical behaviour during the British rule which they bitterly hated because it brought about justice, rule of law and introduced English education system - which threatened their very hegemony. In Madras, the Brahmins started the Hindu English daily to fight the British-owned Madras Mail.

Brahmins supported Hitler: Brahmins invited a notorious rejected British woman, Annie Besant, and made her the president of the National Congress, the party of the Brahmins, to fight the British rulers. They even courted Hitler, invited him to India, promising a red-carpet welcome, travelled to distant Germany, supplied their swastika emblem and made them fight the British.

Darling of the British: Though the Jews and the “Jews of India” are cousins, the two fell into opposite camps: The Jews hating Hitler and Brahmins loving the nazi Germany (Read our book, Brahminism, DSA-2002, photocopy available, Rs. 100).

Hitler’s forces even bombed London and the British, the sole super power of the day, was about to be defeated in the World War-II. But the Jews had a better strategy. They blackmailed the US to support British and join the World War in which Germany was finally defeated.Scenting the danger the Brahminists quickly changed sides and started praising the British and hailing Churchill, the war-time British PM. They have no permanent enemy but only permanent interests.

Will Brahminists surrender to China: They never keep all their eggs in one basket. They will be always with the victors. They quickly endeared themselves to the British, as by then they have already mastered the English language.

The Gujarati Bania as their fondest slave, they quickly managed to become the darling of the British. And then managed through the Jewish Viceroy, Mountbatten, the partition of India. The “Jews of India” finally won.

During our discussions abroad with experts on the Jews and “Jews of India” fears were expressed if the history would repeat in the case of China. Will the Brahminists surrender to their today’s enemy (China) so that their tomorrow will be sure and secure ?

But will the Chinese, firmly rooted in their centuries-old philosophy, who had the courage to rebuff their own ideological-mate, Soviet Russia, be fooled by the Brahminist rulers? Will the Brahminists shamelessly apologise for their 1962 war and their continued the enemity for decades?

China has already became the best friend of all the Brahminist enemies surrounding India: Pakistan, Kashmir, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma, Lanka, Maldives. China has completely encircled India.

China hated Jews: No doubt all these enemies of Brahminist rulers will prevail upon China not to give scope to the “Jews of India”. China never allowed the Jews, who brought communism to Russia, to infiltrate its country. Chairman Mao and Premier Chou En-lai were fully aware of the menace of the Jews and also the ‘Jews of India”.

But in war and love — and politics too — there is nothing like a permanent enemy or friend. The Brahminist “Jews of India”, know how and when to stoop to conquer. Did they not give their wives, sisters and daughters to Muslim rulers? All this is part of history. Chanakya’s Arthasastra asks the Brahmin to stoop to conquer.

So we will not be surprised if the Brahminists try to build bridges and skyways to cross into China and bum-lick China.

But during our discussion, we firmly assured our friends that China will never, ever yield. And our predictions are firmly rooted in Chinese history.(Dalit Voice)

Brahminisim in India & Zionisim in West

Racial supremacism of “Chosen People”

Brahminisim in India & Zionisim in West

Horror story of two world famous tyrants

Little known facts of mind control, lying deceit, treachery, treason, blood, sweat, terror, tears, death & destruction by the world’s two most rigidly segregated societies

New threat to Bahujans: Unity of Jews & “Jews of India”

Foreword: Two sides of same chain

A couple of members of  Dalit Voice Family (DVF) did write us on our coverage of Zionist atrocities. Their POINT WAS ZIONIST ISSUES WERE NOT RELEVANT TO India and the Dalits in particular. To such of them we want to assure that Brahminisim and Zionisim are two sides of the same coin and their close collaboration is of world-wide significance.

Dr. Babasahib Ambedkar, the Father of India and our intellectual guide, had identified the principal enemy of Dalits and also India: Brahminisim Both  Brahmins and the Jews originated from the same geographical area around Iran and both exhibited the same genetic characteristics. Both are mental per perverts, megalomaniacs and physically weak.

Today, both the Jews and “Jews of India” are fully linked and working in close cooperation causing turmoil world-wide. The Israeli Mossad is operating in India in full force and the Government of India is officially collaborating with Israeli defence and Intelligence forces to tackle Muslim and Dalits  in India. As India’s oldest and the largest circulated journal of its entire 85% persecuted nationalities denied human rights, we have a responsibility to alert our family members on the danger posed by the Jews even as we discuss the aggression on Indian culture by the “Jews of India”.

So, we cannot separate the two when the mind and the body of both are the same. We were the first in the world to describe  the Brahmins as the” Jews of India”, a description which they whole-heartedly accepted and also exploited.

When we are combating the” Jews of India” with our back against the wall, is it not our duty to learn from the experience of those who are fighting the Jews? Moreover. When the Jews and the “Jews of India”  are in close collaboration to impose their racist dictatorship, is it not our duty to do everything possible to avert such humanitarian disaster?

Mr. V.T. Rajshekar

Dalit Sahitya Akademy

No. 109-7^th Cross, Place Lower Orchards Bangalore- 560 003, India

e-mail: vtr@ndf.vsnl.net.in, dalitvoice@rediffmail.com

home: www.dalitvoice.org

Kashmiris take ‘Quit Kashmir’ protests to Facebook

“I know I’m sexy,” Srinagar resident Junaid Rafiqi proclaims on his Facebook page, below a professionally lit photograph that, among other things, shows off his possession of an expensive pair of Ray-Ban sunglasses. He goes on with an enthusiasm unfettered by punctuation, spelling and grammar: “I got the looks that drives the girls wild I got the moves that really move them. I send chills up and down their spines” [sic., throughout and below].

Facebook users like Rafiqi have been sending chills down the spines of the police in Jammu and Kashmir for much of this summer. Much to the dismay of the authorities, social networks backing the cause of the Islamist-led protesters have proliferated on the Internet.

There is no evidence that social networks have been used to organise or fund the protests — but their content underlines concerns at the growing influence the religious right-wing has over the educated young people in Kashmir.

“We Hate Omar Abdullah,” a network Mr. Rafiqi often participates in, gives some insight into the world of Kashmir’s Facebook rebels. The network hosts a collection of political satire. There is, for example, a digitally-manipulated image of Paul, the celebrity octopus, picking a dead donkey over the Chief Minister in response to a question who has “more guts.”

But much of the satire is venomously communal. Mr. Abdullah is repeatedly referred to as “Omar Singh” — a derisory reference derived, evidently, from the rumour that his wife is Sikh. The former Chief Minister, Farooq Abdullah, is shown offering respects at a Hindu temple, while another image caricatures the Chief Minister and his wife as pilgrims to the Amarnath shrine. The administrators of the “We Hate Omar Abdullah,” quite clearly see politicians’ efforts to reach out to multiple religious communities as a betrayal.

“The Dalla [broker] family,” the Ray-Ban wearing Rafiqi asserts in one post on the Facebook page, “should be hanged publicly.” Elsewhere, he refers to Mr. Abdullah as a kafir, or unbeliever. In another post on the page, a member asserts that Mr. Abdullah has been denied permission for pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia because of his marriage — a canard circulated by Islamists soon after he took power.

Some networks host express calls to violence. “Everybody,” exhorts the administrator of “Times Now is Anti-Kashmiri,” “[the] next time you see any Times Now correspondent pick up a stone and throw that on their face!.” Arnab Goswami, the channel’s editor-in-chief, one user asserts, “should be killed.” Ethnic-Kashmiri anchor Mahrukh Inayet comes in for unprintable abuse targeting her gender.

Barkha Dutt, arguably India’s best-known English-language television journalist, also draws flak. “We hate Barkha Dutt” contains claims that her reportage on the clashes lacked balance. Much of it, though, consists of personal invective — and threats. “Hell is meant for her,” writes network member Faizan Rashid, “but she should have some kinna punishment in this world as well…‘stoned to death’…wot say?”

Facebook’s terms of use prohibit content that is hateful, threatening or incites violence. Little infrastructure, though, seems to be in place to enforce those terms.

Not all protest-linked networks promote these kinds of invective. Barring the odd comment about “Indian dogs,” “I Protest Against the Atrocities on Kashmiris” has no abusive language. Most posts on this network address questions of media bias and political grievances, not individuals.

Even networks like this, though, are remarkable for the complete absence of the very kinds of serious commentary and debate they believe is wanting in India’s mainstream print and electronic media.

There is no way of telling just who the participants on these sites are: users contacted by The Hindu, including Mr. Rafiqi, did not respond to requests to be interviewed. For the most part, though, users seem to be English-speaking and Kashmiri. Judging by their clothing and cultural idiom, are middle-class. Despite the aggressive religious chauvinism evident on the site, there is nothing to suggest substantial numbers of users support established Islamist clerics.

The police say most young people held on the charge of throwing stones do not have a high-school education, and are either unemployed or semi-employed — a class quite distinct from that of the Facebook radical.

More likely than not, official concerns at these networks is exaggerated: their scale and reach is tiny. “I Protest Against the Atrocities on Kashmiris” has 810 members — small numbers compared, for example, with the Palestine solidarity page “Palestine Freedom,” which has 101,178. “We Hate Omar Abdullah” has 675 members and “Civil Disobedience 2010-Quit Kashmir Movement” 134. “Bloody Indian Media,” set up to protest the reportage of the street violence in Srinagar, has 58.

It is possible, though, that the ideas they propagate reflect new ideological trends among some sections of young people in Jammu and Kashmir — a prospect which, if true, holds out a real reason for concern.