Pages

Friday, August 18, 2023

Kashmir leaders,SC only institution that can uphold supremacy of Constitution

The Supreme Court will have to take a bold stand for upholding the majesty of the Constitution.Mehbooba Mufti 

Unfortunately nobody is talking about the  Instrument of Accession. It is because of Article-370 that the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir temporary  acceded with India otherwise  Jammu and Kashmir  wasn't part of India. So if you  want to remove Article-370 then Jammu and Kashmir   can't remain the part of India.  And another thing is  that there is the  UN Resolution for Kashmir dispute, in which Jawahirlal Nehru has promised the people of J&K that you will be given the opportunity to decide your future by the means of memorandum, that were the terms and conditions on which Instrument of Accession was signed. So better for India would be to either restore the constitution of Jammu and Kashmir 1954 or let the Kashmiris decide their future by means of vote, whether they want  same as before Independent  Jammu and Kashmir or they want to merge with India or Pak. Sheikh Gulzar 

The abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019 provoked intense diplomatic response from the international community. For the most part, India received widespread support for its decision. At the same time, however, there have been criticisms of the restrictions imposed in the region on communication and civil liberties. China and Pakistan, in particular, reacted with hostility and attempted to open a new chapter on Kashmir at the United Nations Security Council. This paper explores how the global conversations on the issue of the erstwhile Kashmir have shifted. It argues that the decision to revoke Article 370 has caused a significant degree of international backlash for India, affecting the country’s narrative on the Valley.